The Concord Monitor Online Edition
The Concord Monitor Online Edition The Concord Monitor Online Edition
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 The news you need now
Subscribe  |  Newsletter  |  Place an ad  |  Contact us
Home
News
Local headlines
Obituaries
Town by town
Politics
New England
Nation-World
We Went To War
Business
Opinion
Editorials
Letters
Columns
Write a letter
Photography
*Pulitzer Winner*
PhotoExtra
Multimedia
Anthrozoology
Photo blog
Teen Life
Web Cam
Entertainment
Dining Deals
Books
Movies
Music
Tuned In
Special Sections
(All Special Sections)
my turn
 
Shea-Porter's gravitational pull on Democrats
Going to extremes will cost Democrats
Font size:
Comments


June 22, 2007 - 12:00 am

By FERGUS CULLEN

As I've watched New Hampshire Democrats abandon the center and lurch to the left this year, going too far, too fast on fiscal issues and social issues, and advancing the Nanny State, I have struggled to come up with a rational political explanation for their behavior. What would make a party ignore its instinct for political self-preservation and flirt with political suicide?

Call it the Carol Shea-Porter Gravitational Effect. For the past decade, conventional wisdom held that New Hampshire Democrats had to position themselves as moderate centrists to win elections. Former governor Jeanne Shaheen taught her party that lesson. Mark Fernald ignored it to his peril. John Lynch absorbed it and, for a time, prospered.

Then in last fall's congressional primary, war protester and unabashed left-wing activist Shea-Porter trounced the Shaheen School's candidate, a play-it-safe political vegetarian who avoided the rhetorical red meat the Democratic base starved for in an effort to preserve his electablity. Shea-Porter went on to edge an incumbent Republican in one of the nation's biggest upsets of 2006.

Shea-Porter's victories were watershed moments that emboldened and empowered the left wing of the New Hampshire Democratic Party. Democratic activists looked at her successes and concluded that no longer do New Hampshire Democrats need to pose or act as centrists. Why go slow? Why seek incremental change? Why compromise for half a loaf when they want the whole thing? The party defined for a decade by Shaheen's cautious centrism gave way to a party embracing Shea-Porter's liberalism.

In Washington, Shea-Porter settled immediately on her party's left flank, even voting against funding New Hampshire soldiers serving in harm's way overseas while moderate Democrats from other states voted to support the troops.

Fellow freshman Rep. Paul Hodes, given cover by Shea-Porter, has tallied a virtually identical liberal voting record. No politically expedient rush to the middle for either of these two.

In Concord, Gov. John Lynch and the seasoned Democratic legislators who lead both houses found the tail wagging the dog as more than 100 freshmen Democrats who have never known life in the minority voted for every left-wing bill introduced. The Democrats increased state spending by 16 percent while raising taxes. They redefined marriage by adopting civil unions and allowed minor children to have abortions without their parents ever finding out their daughter became pregnant.

House Democrats passed a $250 fine on the release of helium balloons, voted to legalize hemp, nearly legalized marijuana, and voted to require seatbelt use. They told private businesses what their smoking policy must be and attempted to regulate how food is cooked in their kitchens. (These measures failed to pass the Senate.)

When given a chance to strike moderate compromises, the Concord Democrats refused. On parental notification, a compromise would have been to amend the old law to address the court's concerns, not repeal it. On civil unions, a compromise would have been to study the issue and hold hearings, then campaign on the issue next year and let the voters decide. And of course House Democrats shot down a compromise education funding amendment, ignoring the pleas of their party's governor and the good-faith efforts of Republican leaders.

One has to think that were Shaheen, who is first and foremost a national class political strategist and tactician, still governor, she would have taken the Concord Democrats aside and said something like, Do you like being in the majority for a change? Would you like to stay there more than one term? Then enough with this left-wing stuff that makes our party look like it's been taken over by aging '60s hippies and the cast of Hair.

One might hope that Gov. Lynch, who sides with the left wing of his party even if he doesn't advocate for them all the time, might spend some his copious political capital and tell his caucuses, "Look, most of you freshmen wouldn't be here without me. You owe it to me to behave responsibly!"

It's obvious that Gov. Lynch is unable or unwilling to restrain his party's base. His inability to lead his party reminds me of the old quote, "There go my people. I must follow them, for I am their leader." But it's not Shaheen and Lynch's centrist Democratic party anymore. It's now dominated by Carol Shea-Porter's left wing activists.

New Hampshire Democrats have reestablished themselves as the party of bigger government, higher taxes, more regulation, and disrespect for our military. One can feel buyer's remorse settling in across New Hampshire as the moderates and independents who took a chance on the Democrats last fall conclude, "This isn't what I thought I was voting for."

(Fergus Cullen is chairman of the New Hampshire Republican Party.)



Single page | 1 | 2 |


 

-->
Top Jobs
View all Top Jobs
NEWSPAPERS IN EDUCATION Concord Monitor can deliver free newspapers to your local school's classrooms. Find out how.
Subscribe | Advertiser Profiles | Jobs | Autos | Real Estate | Classifieds | Photo Reprints | Contact Us

Copyright 1997-2009
Concord Monitor and New Hampshire Patriot
P.O. Box 1177
Concord NH 03302
603-224-5301
Privacy policy
Copyright policy