The Concord Monitor Online Edition
The Concord Monitor Online Edition The Concord Monitor Online Edition
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 The news you need now
Subscribe  |  Newsletter  |  Place an ad  |  Contact us
Home
News
Local headlines
Obituaries
Town by town
Politics
New England
Nation-World
We Went To War
Business
Opinion
Editorials
Letters
Columns
Write a letter
Photography
*Pulitzer Winner*
PhotoExtra
Multimedia
Anthrozoology
Photo blog
Teen Life
Web Cam
Entertainment
Dining Deals
Books
Movies
Music
Tuned In
Special Sections
(All Special Sections)
Paul would improve his odds by moving to New Hampshire
Granite State success would stun his rivals
Font size:
Comments


October 06, 2007 - 12:00 am

If Ron Paul is serious about his presidential candidacy, he should pull a Joe Lieberman and move to New Hampshire for a few months. It didn't work for Lieberman in 2004, but it would give Paul a chance to shock the nation.

There is no other state in the union where Paul could reach more voters in an electorate sympathetic to his libertarian message. In a presidential primary where independent voters matter, he is the Republican with the best shot at attracting them. And his supporters are so devoted they would flock to the state to help him, just like the hippies who got "clean for Gene" in 1968.

Never heard of Ron Paul? He's one of the candidates relegated to the far edge of the stage when Republicans debate. He's the one who really doesn't believe in nation-building, pork-barrel spending or fiscal irresponsibility. His voting record reflects this.

A Texas congressman, Paul is also a RINO, a Republican in name only, but not in the original sense of that term. Usually, a RINO is a Republican officeholder suspected or guilty of acting on Democratic principles. Paul is a libertarian, pure and simple - or not quite pure: pure in his libertarian interpretation of the Constitution but willing to be pragmatic on some government social programs.

He calls himself a Republican only because in a closed two-party system it is the only way he could get a seat at the table. Yet in some respects, he is the most Republican of all the candidates.

Paul's positions differ radically from those of his rivals. He wants American troops out of Iraq immediately. He wants American troops out of Korea. He wants American troops out of Germany. He thinks getting rid of the Taliban in Afghanistan went beyond the mission American troops undertook there. Unlike nearly all the other candidates, he wants to shrink the military, not expand it.

The reason Islamic terrorists want to kill us, Paul says, is that we are occupying their region. They see us as modern crusaders. Remove this provocation, and they'll leave us alone.

Rather than rattle sabers, he says, the United States should seek through diplomacy and incentives to change the Iranians' desire for nuclear weapons. We lived with the Soviet nuclear threat for decades, and in time it disappeared, he says. So why threaten military attack and risk war now over weapons that don't even exist?

On the domestic front, Paul believes in free-market solutions for big challenges like health care. He supports the power of the states to make their own laws on abortion rights, civil rights, drugs, end-of-life issues and stem-cell research.

He uses the last issue as an example of the cockeyed choices Washington politics forces on the public. Why, he asks, should a congressman have to decide between a prohibition on stem-cell research and a federal subsidy for such research? Why not leave the issue to the states and the free-market system?

Defense (as opposed to offense), border security, to some extent infrastructure - these are the proper realm of the federal government, Paul says. Pull back from foreign entanglements and reduce the government's role in other spheres, and you'll have enough money to do these things well. And although Social Security and Medicare rub against his philosophy, small government will leave enough money to save them as well.

In short, the Paul program is leaner, more efficient government, greater individual liberty and an end to foreign adventures. In a presidential race in which most candidates on both sides of the ballot see murkiness as a virtue, this is a crystal clear message. And the messenger is about as pleasant a politician as you'd ever want to meet.

That's why Paul ought to move to New Hampshire and try to win our primary. Our state has always had a strong libertarian streak. Sometimes it bucks the establishment. But voters here like to be asked. To trust a candidate, they have to know him or her.

Paul has been the surprise of the campaign so far, attracting legions of devoted, mostly younger enthusiasts.

As he said during an editorial board at the Monitor a few days ago, the Paul boomlet has surprised him, too.



Single page | 1 | 2 |


 

-->
Top Jobs
View all Top Jobs
NEWSPAPERS IN EDUCATION Concord Monitor can deliver free newspapers to your local school's classrooms. Find out how.
Subscribe | Advertiser Profiles | Jobs | Autos | Real Estate | Classifieds | Photo Reprints | Contact Us

Copyright 1997-2009
Concord Monitor and New Hampshire Patriot
P.O. Box 1177
Concord NH 03302
603-224-5301
Privacy policy
Copyright policy