The Concord Monitor Online Edition
The Concord Monitor Online Edition The Concord Monitor Online Edition
Tuesday, February 9, 2010 The news you need now
Subscribe  |  Newsletter  |  Place an ad  |  Contact us
Home
News
Local headlines
Obituaries
Town by town
Politics
New England
Nation-World
We Went To War
Business
Opinion
Editorials
Letters
Columns
Write a letter
Photography
*Pulitzer Winner*
PhotoExtra
Multimedia
Anthrozoology
Photo blog
Teen Life
Web Cam
Entertainment
Dining Deals
Books
Movies
Music
Tuned In
Special Sections
(All Special Sections)
Campaign 2008
 
Obama's use of money questioned
Clinton implies PAC donations flouted law
Font size:
Comments


November 28, 2007 - 6:55 am

Related articles:
Obama outlines diplomatic path (11/28/2007)

Hillary Clinton has raised questions about Democratic rival Barack Obama's use of a political action committee to funnel money to Democratic candidates in New Hampshire and other key early voting states.

Through the fund - commonly referred to as a leadership PAC - Obama has given $73,000 to New Hampshire candidates and Democratic committees from July through November, according to a report filed with the Federal Election Commission. Several of those candidates have endorsed Obama, some after receiving a donation.

At issue is how candidates use their leadership PACs, which are designed to distribute money to other candidates and political committees. Candidates are forbidden from using leadership PACs to directly advance their campaigns, campaign finance experts said. After the Washington Post reported the donations earlier this week, the Clinton campaign released a statement implying that Obama was flouting campaign laws.

"It is our understanding that a candidate's campaign is barred from using the candidate's leadership PAC to benefit his or her campaign which is why we shut down Hill PAC when Senator Clinton announced her run for the White House," the statement said. "On the campaign trail, Senator Obama is outspoken about his desire to reform the campaign finance system, so it was surprising to learn that he has been using his PAC in a manner that appears to be inconsistent with the prevailing election laws."

Obama's campaign responded by denouncing the statement and upping the conflict, attempting to demonstrate larger differences between the candidates on financial disclosure.

"Whatever happened to the confident frontrunner who said she wouldn't attack other Democrats just two weeks ago?" Obama spokesman Bill Burton said in a statement. "The latest personal attack from Hillary Clinton is a completely false attempt to misrepresent Barack Obama's full disclosure of his campaign finances.

"Senator Obama's commitment to disclosure is one that Hillary Clinton does not share, and until Senator Clinton is willing to make this commitment by disclosing her White House records, the list of donors to her husband's presidential library, how much her bundlers raise, and releasing her personal tax returns to the public - she's not really in a position to point fingers at others," Burton said.

The Obama campaign response prompted more reaction from the Clinton camp. "Instead of launching irrelevant attacks, Sen. Obama should answer a simple question: Did Obama campaign officials direct the (PAC) to make contributions to officials and entities in states holding nominating contests?" Clinton spokeswoman Kathleen Strand said. "If the answer is no, they should just be direct and say so."

The Obama campaign's attorney, Bob Bauer, maintained that the PAC's activities were entirely within bounds. "It's really a political attack because it has no merit at all as a legal attack," he said.

Leadership PACs

Critics of leadership PACs argue that they allow candidates to sidestep some fundraising regulations, since donors can contribute more to a leadership PAC than a campaign: A leadership PAC donor can give $5,000 a year, while donors can give only $2,300 to a political campaign for each election, said Paul Ryan, an attorney at the nonprofit Campaign Legal Center.

"Leadership PACs have become a wide-open slush fund," Ryan said.

In theory, he said, candidates aren't allowed to use leadership PACs to advance their own presidential campaigns. Most politicians considering a presidential run will create leadership PACs, which allow them to lay the groundwork for a campaign before they officially announce their candidacies.

Candidates "use them to pay for repeated trips to New Hampshire, Iowa and South Carolina two or three years before an election to talk about issues," Ryan said.

And as long as the candidates don't mention that they're running for office, they can use leadership PAC money, he added. If a candidate visits an early voting state "just to talk about the war in Iraq or minimum wage or right to life, and you're carefully coached by your attorney to stay away from talking about your candidacy, you pay for it" with the leadership PAC.



Single page | 1 | 2 | 3 |


 

-->
Top Jobs
View all Top Jobs
NEWSPAPERS IN EDUCATION Concord Monitor can deliver free newspapers to your local school's classrooms. Find out how.
Subscribe | Advertiser Profiles | Jobs | Autos | Real Estate | Classifieds | Photo Reprints | Contact Us

Copyright 1997-2009
Concord Monitor and New Hampshire Patriot
P.O. Box 1177
Concord NH 03302
603-224-5301
Privacy policy
Copyright policy