In rural northern Vermont, it took until the 1960s to run power lines to some towns - decades after the rest of America.
These days, it's the digital revolution that remains but a rumor in much of rural America.
Dial-up user Val Houde knows this as well as anybody. After moving to East Burke, Vt., four years ago, the 51-year-old mother of four took a correspondence course for medical transcription, hoping to work from home. She plunked down $800, took the course, then found out the software wasn't compatible with dial-up internet, the only kind available to her.
Selling items on eBay, watching videos, playing games online? Forget it. The connection from her home computer is so slow, her online life is one of delays, degraded quality and "buffering" warning messages. So she waits until the day a provider extends broadband to her house.
"I feel like these companies, they don't care about these little pockets of places," she said one night recently, showing a visitor her computer's slow internet service. "And I know we're not the only ones."
For Houde and millions of other Americans laboring under slow or no internet service, help is on the way.
Bolstered by billions in federal stimulus money, an effort to expand broadband internet access to rural areas is under way, an ambitious 21st-century infrastructure project with parallels to the New Deal electrification of the nation's hinterlands in the 1930s and 1940s.
In the Depression, it was power to the people - for farm equipment and living-room lamps, cow-milking machines and kitchen appliances. Now, it's online access - to YouTube and digital downloads, to videoconferencing and Facebook, to eBay and Twitter.
"Rural areas all across the country are wrestling with this, somewhat desperately," said Paul Costello, executive director of the Vermont Council on Rural Development. "Young people who grow up with the media will not live where they can't be connected to digital culture. So most rural communities have been behind the eight ball."
Seventy years ago, President Franklin Delano Roosevelt realized that if private industry wouldn't run power lines out to the farthest reaches of rural areas, it would take government money to help make it happen. In 1935, the Rural Electrification Administration was established to deliver electricity to the Tennessee Valley and beyond.
Now, money from the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act is doing the same with broadband, which is typically defined as DSL (digital subscriber line), cable modem, fiber optic or fixed wireless.
The stimulus act set aside $7.2 billion for expansion of broadband access, believing it will spur economic growth, boost educational opportunities and create jobs. The money has jump-started what were existing efforts by states and telecom providers to bridge the digital divide of rural America.
I live in Webster. The town that borders on Concord, Hopkinton, Boscawen and Warner.
We just got access to DSL a few years ago. We still don't have cable. We were told we will never have cable. And we are right next to Concord!
to vote
It's an issue for people on the housing market for sure. A home w/o broadband access is a difficult home to sell today, but in a few years? It will be impossible. Satellite speeds just can't match cable or fiber optics, and the price for even a fraction of what cable can offer is outrageous. And DSL is not going to cut it. A few years from now, it will be just like dial-up: woefully inadequate. If we don't get the whole state wired with cable or fiber optics, NH is going to be left behind in the 20'th century.
to vote
It's all about building our our infrastructure in these rural areas. By providing internet access, it allows these areas new economic opportunities and makes them more competitive when enticing new businesses to move to the area. A satellite link would fix the problem for that one house, a cable line will fix the problem for the whole community.
to vote
I find it interesting how towns limit the building permits each year to slow growth but yet now you/they want the tax payers to pay for high speed internet to each house so "it allows these areas new economic opportunities and makes them more competitive when enticing new businesses to move to the area". Which is it - slow or fast growth. How can the towns grow if they will not give permits to build. I got a permit from my town to build but had to wait until the next year to build, all the permits were used for that year.
I thought UNH got about $50 million stimulus dollars last year to improve internet in NH??? Was ther ever a report on how the money was spent and what actual improvent was gained???
to vote
You still need dial up.
The satellite system only down loads, yes it is "up to 50 times faster" but not really.
To the upload is still limited to the dial up speed you can achieve.
Some systems offer 2 way, but the requests still need to route through the dial up network.
to vote
Comparing the need for internet service to the need for electricity is a big stretch.
But I have a question for the electronic geeks - Dish networks advertises "It's up to 50 times faster than dial-up". Which is more cost effective - dish or cable. Seems like the dish network is up and running, would it not be more cost effective to screw a dish on the house vs. installing new cable/optic lines to every house. The dish networks give you the dish for FREE - well there is (and will be) a monthly charge just like cable.
But Abe - the point is valid, if you "chose" to move to a very rural location then you do not get all services that populated areas get. They knew that and chose to move there. I do not think it is the tax payers responsibility to foot the bill for them to have the fastest internet possible, remember before this work gets completed, it will be even faster. This is not a life or death situation here, we have no money to fix the bridge to their house or make sure they even have clean drinking water or sewerage treatment, but internet is a top priority.
And YES, Some people choose to live on "island time".
to vote
all those people just needed to go out and purchase satellite packages, but then again, why not waste more money we don't have......
I see you also got up on that wrong side of the bed again....
to vote
The post violates the Discussion Guidelines.
obscenity