3 candidates lead funding

By PHILIP ELLIOTT and KASIE HUNT

Only three Republican presidential candidates are worth any money - campaign money, that is.

Mitt Romney, Rick Perry and Ron Paul have banked millions. But the other GOP candidates are struggling or broke, putting their candidacies in question four months before the first nominating contests take place.

Ahead of a critical fundraising deadline Friday, all of the GOP's contenders - regardless of the level of their financial health - are furiously courting donors in Texas, Georgia, Washington, D.C., and elsewhere. It's a last-minute attempt to pick up cash before they file a three-month summary that will measure one aspect of the financial strength of their campaigns.

"With the support of people like you, we will be able to get America back to work again," Romney wrote to his email list yesterday while he personally pressed donors in New York to pony up.

The candidates' own cash is just part of the picture because, this year, outside groups are allowed to raise and spend unlimited amounts of money to back specific candidates. And allies of Romney, Perry and Paul all have formed so-called SuperPACs to help their preferred candidates win the nomination.

That money aside, Romney is likely to post the strongest fundraising numbers, although his spokeswoman, Andrea Saul, said he'll raise "considerably less" than he did in the first three months of the year. In that period he reported gathering $18 million.

Perry donors claim he could hit $10 million raised since he entered the race early last month. His advisers, however, dispute that. They're lowering expectations either so Perry's haul looks more impressive when it's announced, or it's an indication that the GOP front-runner hasn't seen a flood of money accompany the huge dose of enthusiasm he initially generated.

Paul's campaign asked supporters to celebrate the Texas congressman's Aug. 20 birthday with a donation - and they gave him $1.6 million on that day alone. It's a pattern for Paul; his loyal libertarian backers have delivered on five occasions, to the tune of $1 million or more at a time.

The rest of the field lags far, far behind. Jon Huntsman, the former Utah governor who is in the single digits in most state and national public opinion polls, recently had to write himself a half-million dollar check to keep his campaign afloat. Minnesota Rep. Michele Bachmann spent so much money in Iowa in August to win a statewide test vote that her web videos look more amateur than professional now. Former House speaker Newt Gingrich is still mired in debt. Herman Cain, the former pizza company executive, has loaned himself hundreds of thousands of dollars so he can keep running. And Rick Santorum's team acknowledges that the former Pennsylvania senator is barely scraping by.

All of these second- and third-tier candidates are trying to prove that they are still viable while trying to gather enough cash to pay for polling and advertising to push them through the pack. That's only going to get harder. Campaign fundraising is expensive. It limits time candidates can spend with voters.

"Listen: Money will always follow a message and a winning candidate. When you're out there moving up in the polls, you're going to be able to raise more money. That's just the way the system works," said Huntsman, who has contributed at least $2.5 million of his own cash since entering the race in June. He also has a SuperPAC backing him, though it's unclear just how much it's collected.

Bachmann, too, has help from an outside organization. Early on, the Tea Party favorite built a base of small but repeated donors. But she's faced the challenge of pairing that network with people willing to chip in the $2,500 maximum. A huge investment in Iowa last month resulted in victory at an early test vote in the lead-off caucus state. But she fizzled out after that as Perry eclipsed her in state and national polls.