NECAP tests on way out

Share this

By CAMERON KITTLE

The New England Common Assessment Program is on its way out in New Hampshire.

The state Department of Education is planning to implement a new standardized test system to measure reading and math proficiency starting in 2013-14, said Paul Leather, deputy commissioner of education.

The state will discontinue using the NECAP for reading and math after one more round of testing in October, and then roll out the Smarter Balanced Assessment the next school year. Leather described the new test as a stronger assessment with no increased cost.

"It will make the data more useful at the classroom and school level, in planning and adjusting the curriculum and instruction," Leather said.

The state has been using the NECAP since 2005. It is a collaborative assessment, developed with the state departments of education in Vermont and Rhode Island. The NECAP tests students in math and reading and the results are used to determine if schools meet Adequate Yearly Progress goals, which are federally mandated by the No Child Left Behind law.

Leather said the new test will be online and adaptive, which means it will change based on how the student performs. If a student answers a question correctly, the test presents a harder question next; if the student answers a question incorrectly, the next question is a bit easier.

This model is present in several other testing environments, including the Graduate Record Examinations and the Graduate Management Admission Test, which are both administered to graduate school applicants.

The results of the Smarter Balanced Assessment will also be available faster, Leather said, which should help teachers and administrators.

Whether statewide assessments will be possible by the time the new test is set to roll out is in question.

There is support among some in the state Legislature to pull out of No Child Left Behind. The House passed a bill last week that would withdraw New Hampshire from participation going forward.

Mark Joyce, executive director of the New Hampshire School Administrators Association, doesn't think the bill will pass. Joyce spoke out against the legislation because it would cost the state $60 million in federal funding for public education.

"The pure reason for opposing it is the consequence that we'll lose that money," Joyce said. "It's been coming to schools for almost 50 years."

If the bill passes, Joyce said he's not sure what would happen to the Smarter Balanced Assessment.

"I don't know what the funding levels would be to support something like that," he said. "I'd like to see an improvement over the current system, and the (Smarter Balanced Assessment) seems like the right direction to go."

If implemented as planned, the Smarter Balanced Assessment will allow schools to find out if students are performing below or above their grade levels. It will cover language arts and math. New Hampshire would continue using the NECAP for science testing, though science results are not used for accountability purposes.

The Smarter Balanced Assessment would be administered in the spring, as opposed to the NECAP, which is administered in the fall.

Nashua Assistant Superintendent Brian Cochrane said the time change could have both positive and negative effects on students and teachers.

"There's a notion that spring testing can sometimes bring a 'cram-it' mentality," he said. "With fall testing, you can't cram for it and it pushes teachers to teach for high-order thinking and retention over a longer term. But all in all, it makes more sense from school-based personnel to switch to a spring assessment."

The Smarter Balanced test will "ratchet up" expectations in reading and writing, Cochrane said, but New Hampshire is still fortunate in that regard.

"We've had pretty robust and challenging assessments, and we also had writing in all of our assessments, while a lot of states went multiple-choice only," he said. "That is one real strength of what we've been doing. It's less change for us." (next page »)

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

How long before they change the name of MATH to something like numerology conjecture

based on ability of todays youth to even compute meals tax or a tip on a restaurant bill......... the study should be renamed appropriately

sail's picture

it sounds to me like they are going to "dumb down" the test. Next they will have a test to see of the students are skilled in "critical thinking", you know, the agenda that figures out if the propaganda of the Left and indoctrination is working.

I like your assessment of the math skills and it is so true. How many teen and twenty something cashiers in restaurants and retail stores can count back change. Today they simply say, "here" and can't get it into your hands fast enough.

Science could be renamed "Settled Agenda" and Social Studies could be renamed "Social Engineering and Agenda Indoctrination". Music education could be renamed "Tunes,,,Maaaan".

Now foreign languages could be renamed as well with Spanish and Chinese being the two main languages replacing English. Let's call is "Rightful Owners of the West and Language of our Masters".

La Raza could develop the Spanish curriculum and I am sure that the Chinese probably own a stake in most text book companies by now.

ItsaRepublic's picture
Don't miss this
Customer service: