Concord

Juries to be laid off in February

Spending cuts on court system agenda
article tools

Superior courts throughout the state will suspend jury trials for a month this winter to save money. Asked by the governor's office to suggest more spending cuts, the Supreme Court's chief justice has floated the idea of leaving open a seat on the state's highest court from February until summer.

The temporary suspension of jury trials this winter will save about $73,000, said Superior Court Chief Justice Robert Lynn, because the state won't have to pay per diems to the hundreds of people summoned for jury duty in a typical month, which is $10 a half day or a mileage reimbursement.

"This is a difficult cut to make because it directly affects people who want to have their cases heard and that's what we're all about," Lynn said. "This is what we're supposed to be doing."

With the state's budget for fiscal year 2009 expected to fall $250 million short of original projections, every part of state government has had to cut back. The court system has already cut $2.6 million out of its 2009 budget and expects further instruction to cut more than $430,000 this fiscal year, which ends in June, said administrator Don Goodnow.

That amount coincides with the $430,000 worth of cuts that Supreme Court Chief Justice John Broderick suggested in a recent letter to Gov. John Lynch at the request of the governor's office. The biggest item on the list: holding open until June the Supreme Court vacancy that will be created when Judge Richard Galway steps down in February. That, Broderick wrote, would save nearly $68,000 this fiscal year.

A Lynch spokesman said the governor will fill the Supreme Court post in due course. "The governor intends to fill that slot once the judicial selection process is complete," said spokesman Colin Manning.

Already, the court system has made major cuts. Of the 59 slots for trial judges in the state, seven spots are vacant, Broderick wrote to Lynch in a letter dated Nov. 18.

"We have asked you not to fill these vacancies at this time and, with great reluctance, we now extend that request such that new judges . . . would not begin until on or after June 5, 2009," Broderick wrote.

"The remaining judges are struggling to make up the difference in judge time and recently all of my colleagues on the Supreme Court have agreed to each take a turn in the trial courts to try to lessen that burden," Broderick wrote.

Meanwhile, Broderick wrote, the court system is holding open 36 out of 614 vacant posts for nonjudges. It's cut mileage reimbursements for judges, cut their security budget and reduced legal library spending.

The suspension of jury trials throughout the state this winter will take a particular toll in Merrimack County, where jury panels sit for a bit longer than elsewhere in the state. That means there will be no juries from mid-February until the beginning of April. All told, said Merrimack County Clerk Bill McGraw, 13 scheduled criminal trials and 43 civil trials will be pushed off.

In the meantime, McGraw said, court staff will focus on nonjury trials, pretrial hearings and paperwork.

"Actually there is substantial work now in rescheduling all of those close to 60 jury trials," he said.

Most of the nine courts that will suspend trials will do so in February. The only counties that will not be affected are Sullivan and Coos, Lynn said, because they have jury trials every other month.

The heaviest toll of this trial suspension will fall on people involved in civil cases, McGraw and Lynn said. Criminal trials must follow a swift schedule because defendants are guaranteed a right to a speedy trial. Courts typically give second priority to civil cases, which involve conflicts between people or businesses regarding property or contracts.

"Civil cases were getting the short shrift anyway," Lynn said. "This is going to do that even more." (next page »)

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

The only cuts they can come up with?

It was not to long ago that there was an article about how the courts are back logged and judges are overworked. Now, the courts wants to suspend hiring new judges and delay jury trials. Why don't they address the problem instead of just putting it off until tomorrow?

In all due respect to the good police officers that are trying to be impartial and do a good job, the courts could reduce their work load by holding police officers responsible for falsifying complaints and misrepresenting applications for arrest warrants. The U.S. Supreme court stated that it benefits the court system to hold police officers responsible to make them reflect before filing charges. The Attorney General's Law Enforcement Manaul also requires police officers to present all the facts on applications for warrants so they can avoid being accused of misrepresenting the applications. This is not my opinion, but the opinion of the U.S. Supreme Court and the N.H. Attorney General's Law Enforcement Manual. Why do the courts ignore the sound advice of holding police officers responsible for actions that violate the fourteenth amendment and the officer's oath of office?

The courts could also reduce their work load by holding public officials responsible for their actions. How many lawsuits are caused by public officials who do not want to follow the law? The courts help cover-up public corruption thus encouraging public officials to ignore the law and create more lawsuits? I watched the courts allow our local public officials get away with ignoring the Right to Know Law by using the excuse, "they were unaware minutes were prepared", even though the law requires minutes to be prepared. Maybe, we the citizens should try this excuse in court and see how far we would get with telling the court "we were unaware of the law".

Anonymous's picture

Get Serious

When the governor asked for cuts, he meant cuts! That proposed is a joke and an
insult to the people of this state. Cut the fat! It has to happen. State audit, not by
paid private contract! Get it done! Shuffle your feet after you retire!

Anonymous's picture

How many court personal is

How many court personal is there lobbying at the LOB at any given day?????
How many court personal is there seating on Legislative Hearings ??????
Is there no SEPARATION OF POWERS???????
How many court personal is there using our court time to travel to Russia, Afghanistan,or where ever on state time a money?????
Treasonous I'd say.

Anonymous's picture

Is this a violations of Rights?

Protect the right to a speed trial by a jury of peers. This seems to be a less than wise way to save a few bucks. Turn down the heat in the court buildings to 60 degrees, the state would probably save more money.

Anonymous's picture

Great idea!-NOT

Lets delay putting criminals in jails because of cost? When we continue to allow the state Wardens (who each make over 90K per year) a State Vehicle to use and travel to and from work daily. Personal perks and cars need to be taken away first and change needs to start at the top of state goverment - not the bottom. They don't need cars and need to use their own vehicles commuting but we do need to lock up follks and not delay trials of criminals.

Anonymous's picture

Don't miss this