Pa. bucks Specter; Ky. backs Paul

Democrat takes Murtha's seat

Party-switching Sen. Arlen Specter fell to a younger and less experienced rival in the Pennsylvania Democratic primary, and political novice Rand Paul rode support from Tea Party activists to a Republican rout in Kentucky yesterday, the latest jolts to the political establishment in a tumultuous midterm election season.

In another race with national significance, Democrat Mark Critz won a special House election to fill out the term of the late Democratic Rep. John Murtha in southwestern Pennsylvania. Both political parties spent roughly $1 million to sway the outcome, and highlighted the contest as a possible bellwether for the fall.

On the busiest night of the primary season to date, Arkansas Democratic Sen. Blanche Lincoln led in her bid for nomination to a third term but was forced into a potentially debilitating runoff on June 8 against Lt. Gov. Bill Halter.

Taken together, the results were indisputably unkind to the political establishments of both parties. But any attempt to read into the results a probable trend for the fall campaign was hazardous - particularly given Critz's victory over Republican Tim Burns to succeed Murtha in Congress.

Specter fell to two-term Rep. Joe Sestak, who spent three decades in the Navy before entering politics. Sestak was winning 54 percent of the vote to 46 percent for Specter. He told cheering supporters his triumph marked a "win for the people over the establishment, over the status quo, even over Washington, D.C."

Sestak's campaign calling card was a television commercial that showed former president George W. Bush saying he could count on Specter, then a Republican, and then had Specter saying he had switched parties so he could win re-election. Once unleashed, it coincided with a steady decline in Specter's early lead in the polls and signaled the end of the political line for the most durable politician of his generation in Pennsylvania.

Former representative Pat Toomey won the Republican nomination and will run against Sestak in the fall in what is likely to be one of the marquee races in the battle for control of the Senate.

Paul's victory was certain to add Kentucky to that list.

"I have a message, a message from the Tea Party, a message that is loud and clear and does not mince words: We have come to take our government back," he said, a 47-year-old eye surgeon making his first run for office.

The same energy that helped Paul to victory presented problems to be handled carefully by the GOP in the run-up to November, when control of both houses of Congress will be at stake.

Paul has said he might not support his fellow Kentuckian, U.S. Senate Minority Leader Mitch McConnell, for a new term as party leader. And no sooner had yesterday's results been posted than Richard Viguerie, a longtime conservative warrior, suggested McConnell step aside.

The far-flung races took place a little less than five months before the midterm elections. President Obama backed incumbents in his party's races, but despite the stakes for his legislative agenda the White House insisted he was not following the results very closely.

Whatever the fate of the parties, opinion polls - and the defeat of two veteran lawmakers in earlier contests - already had turned the campaign into a year of living dangerously for incumbents.

High unemployment, an economy just now emerging from the worst recession in generations and Congress's decision to bail out Wall Street giants in 2008 all added to voters' unease, polls said. In a survey released shortly before the polls closed, ABC said voter expectations for the economy had turned optimistic for the first time in six years. At that, only 33 percent of those polled said so in the network's polling, compared with 29 percent saying the opposite. (next page »)

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

It's ok,  The Dow is down less than 4%.  Oh, those embarrassing head shots. Implants not all they cracked up 2 B ? Sleep my pretty.

Abu's picture

who "wins" next year. the voters aren't particularly interested in the issues. voters today are reacting to the economic conditions in this country, and blame the present governing body. there is no sense of history, or a recognition of past policies and practices that got us where we are today. a response by voters to "throw the bums out" will do little to address the many issues we face as a nation.

let's say the tea party candidates get in. what happens when it becomes clear they aren't capable of delivering on their promises within the first year?

this is one of the most reactionary, impatient and rude electorates i have seen in my 30 years of voting. perhaps we have to go through this to remind voters of why we need bipartisanship.

snowbunny's picture

.......are you serious?  Voters aren't particularly interested in the issues?  You are kidding, right?Is the economy not an "issue"?  What about immigration and our government refusing to address illegals pouring over our borders; or Obama stopping the border fence?What about the failed stimulus or the federal bailout of car companies?   How about our placation of dictators and zealots on the world stage?  The Obama apologies?On your side, what about Obama not ending the war in Iraq and his escalation in Afghanistan?   What about Pelosi and the Democrats cramming a 2800 page health care bill down our throats and the new revelation that it will be so much more expensive than promised?What about Congress ignoring the majority of the citizenry standing against Cap and Trade?  Or unemployment at 10%, which was promised to be much less by Congress and the President?Those are the "issues" that we face as a nation and they are not improving under this Congress or the President.Rude?  I thought that dissent was the highest form of patriotism?  That was the progressive mantra for 8 years and talk about "rude", what about those protests with pictures of Bush disguised as Hitler?Impatient you say?  Reactionary you say?  Reactionary....I hope so.....Obama world stage apologies, Obama excoriating the Arizona law, which simply reinforces federal law that both Bush and Obama refuse to enforce, Congress people wanting to nationalize industries, Obama telling us how much we should be allowed to earn and keep......and on and on.You need a reality check...................Congress gave the citizenry the middle finger.  Not just Democrats but Republicans as well.  That silent majority has had just about enough.  Call it rude or reationary or anything you want....I call it patriotism.  No, not some redefined patriotism, real patriotism........maybe you should take a lesson.

millennia's picture

i am serious.  we're all idiots, making sure congress is gridlocked.  ask yourself, who wins??   the status quo counts on our stupidty. they seem to have a successful formula. 

snowbunny's picture

I am not sure that we need to constantly be passing new laws and creating new entitlements.I believe that your definition of "gridlocked" is that people are standing in the way, questioning the Obama agenda and motives and not just "going along" in some blind attempt to try his idea of "change".That is not gridlock, it is independence and not marching in lockstep to one tune."Gridlock" is the same as "obstructionism" in your book.  Both are political buzz words for giving Obama a blank check.Status quo is not a bad thing........

millennia's picture

Is never in more jeopardy than when Congress is in session"Thomas Jefferson(paraphrased?)

Dave in Suncook's picture

perhaps?

Abu's picture

I have now heard two broadcast interviews with Rand Paul in which he has trouble endorsing the 1960s era Civil Rights Act that outlaws discrimination on the basis of race in employment and places of public accommodation (movies, grocery stores, lunch counters and the like).He says he opposes discrimination, but apparently does not believe  federal law should  ban it.He also expresses doubts about the Americans with Disabilities Act, which as knocked down both the physical and cultural barriers preventing people with disabilities from leading productive and independent lives.This is the classic elevation of private property rights over human rights. Tea Party supporters should be ashamed of this candidate's positions.John Corrigan

corrigannh's picture

He must be a racist and disabilophobe.   Oh my god!!!!!!!!!Not the lunch counter!!!!!!!!   Are there still lunch counters out there?

millennia's picture

I did not describe Paul as racist. I don't know the man well enough to make such a judgment.What I do know is that he cannot bring himself to support a law that can be credited with much of the progress our great country has made in the area of civil rights.If we had relied on local control or states' rights, it would still be legal to refuse to employ or serve someone for a discriminatory reason. We need the power of the federal government to ensure that all of our people have the most basic human rights.Reasonale people can debate the pros and cons of affirmative action. The Civil Rights Act reflects what should be a national consensus based on justice. No candidate who fails to understand that is worthy of elected office.John Corrigan

corrigannh's picture

...and realize what you're saying.  Rand Paul's position is not just about "lunch counters."  Rand Paul may not be a racist in his heart  but believes that a private business should not be prohibited by law from, for example, refusing to hire somebody because they're black....or because they're white for that matter. He does not believe that private businesses should be held accountable in any way for the sexual harassment of an employee.  He believes that a restaurant should be able to refuse service to somebody because they have a disability.  Or more to the point that there shouldn't be any laws preventing a business from refusing service to somebody because of a disability.You surely don't agree with these positions, do you? Now I realize that you may have issues with how the Civil Rights Act of 1964 can be applied, affirmative action, etc. But this isn't about the extremes.  That description above is his position...do you agree with it?

yesacrellim's picture

......know, that people are pretty sick and tired about hearing about racism and discrimination.Working in the private sector and knowing many, many businesses here in NH and in about 20 other states, there is not that kind of discrimination going on.  In fact, I can't tell you how many time I have been told to seek out a minority candidate.  A few years ago a company interviewed me and later I found out from the recruiter that they were looking for a "woman" to fill the position.  It cuts on the other side more often and there is no protection for those in the majority.....at all!Accomodation for the disabled is very costly to companies and the taxpayer.  Now, before you say anything, we certainly do need protections but the letter of the ADA is very difficult to meet for small businesses.  More legislation which has gone too far and is too strong.Conversely, companies which are minority centric or run by minorities are not held to the same harsh standards and scrutiny of discrimination.  I know this first hand as well.Then there is multi-culturalism.  We will never have a united society if we keep pointing out differences, yet constantly talk about racism and discrimination.What used to be a melting pot is not a "celebration of diversity".  The Rand Paul's of the world and the Reverend Wright's are fueled by the progressive "diversity" mantra.  There is no middle ground and many of us are just fed up with no alternatives and to extremes on both sides.If you want to solve these problems we need to focus a little less on "Pluribus" and a little more on "Unum" as it applies to one country sharing the same values, language and culture.Sexual harrassment?  Necessary legislation...YES!   Overused and abused....YES!  And anyone can be accused if another person really wants to screw with them.  More feel good legislation being abused.  Political correctness, in many instances, run amok.No, Y-crellim, I don't support the Rand Paul style agenda...but I do think that we need to bring some of these racial preferences or preferential college admissions procedures or affirmantive action preferences back down to earth.  What we need is a "color blind" society, not one that points out differences and then asks their citizens to not consider them.  You can't have it both ways!I do not believe that there is rampant racism or discrimination based on 'skin color'.  That is a fallacy.  

millennia's picture

n/t

yesacrellim's picture

Specter changed eyewitness accounts of JFK's assassination to protect the hit squad leader: Dallas CIA station chief George Herbert Walker Bush who claims he can't remember being photographed on the steps of the Texas school book depository.  You know the place where textbooks come from that say only 3 bullets were fired that day in Dallas and that oil is good for you. Drink more oil. Swim in it. Love it. Oil is good oil is great.  Specter also voted to eliminate the Writ of Habeas Corpus from Congresses big book of rules. An action he admitted was treasonous. The road to the moral high ground is paved with torture right Arlen? The real problem is the awakening of the American public to the fourth Reich and it's practitioners, who are finally getting the " comes around" part.  

Abu's picture

Has begun.And Obama is now 0-4 supporting candidates.The new name for progressive liberals...MUD.

Dave in Suncook's picture

"WASHINGTON — Voters rejected one of President Barack Obama's hand-picked candidates and forced another into a runoff, the latest sign that his political capital is slipping beneath a wave of anti-establishment anger.Sen. Arlen Specter became the fourth Democrat in seven months to lose a high-profile race despite the president's active involvement, raising doubts about Obama's ability to help fellow Democrats in this November's elections.The first three candidates fell to Republicans. But Specter's loss Tuesday to Rep. Joe Sestak in Pennsylvania's Democratic senatorial primary cast doubts on Obama's influence and popularity even within his own party — and in a battleground state, no less" From the Home Page of Comcast. Like I said before I sure hope Obama comes here and endorses Shea Porter, Hodes and Shaheen..

armyvet's picture

Was a Turncoat against his party so deserved to be kicked out of office. Shea Porter, Hodes, Shaheen are not Turncoats against the party, liberal branch of the Dem. Party, but are Turncoats against our citizens and our country. Real Hope and Real Change is coming soon.

armyvet's picture

The "lame stream media" has this 1/2 right. They report that there is an anti emcumbent mood in the country, that's true, if the emcumbent voted for TARP, Health insurance reform and the jobs bail out.
Hodes, Shea Porter and Shaheen should take heed.

We should keep an eye on Dr Paul (no pun intended)

NH_Native's picture

While I see many comments from giddy Tea party folks Democrats have as much, if not more, to be pleased with.  Mark Critz's win in PA is thought to be a huge indicator of how things will play out this fall and that is good news for Democrats.  I also think the Tea Party cadidate's victory in KY over Sen minority leader Mitch McConnell's choice is indicative of what will happen to the Republican party between now and November.  The Republican party is in the process of being torn apart by the Tea Party and that's good news for Dems.  While the Tea Party slaps themselves on the back with small victories they are ignoring the larger picture as they move futher and further to the right and alinate the Independant middle.  I am rooting for the Tea Party because they are the Democrats best hope to not lose too many seats in November!!

Scrupp's picture

Mark Critz should have won that seat as he had a 2 to 1 registered Democrat advantage going into this election.  No big deal but progressives are spinning.No, the Tea Party is not an organized party and they will hurt some Republicans but Republicans will support them in the election, if for no other reason, to stop the insidiously anti-American Obama agenda.I know that Democrats are hoping that the vote will splinter but in this case, Rand Paul was a populist, much like Obama was a populist.Obama was the big loser yesterday.  In PA, Murtha's replacement, basically ran against Obama stating that he would not have voted for health care, that he stood for tax cuts, etc.   If he lied, he will serve one term, we shall see.  Other candidates do not want Obama campaigning with them.Democrats who are not incumbents may not have as much to worry about, but incumbents will have a harder time distancing themselves from Obama.What we are really talking about here are candidates telling the voters something to confuse them and have them cast their vote in hopes of that candidate not following the Obama agenda and then having them go to Washington and support the Obama agenda.  I can't believe that honest Democrats would support that.Then we have people here, commenting on this topic saying that they hope the other side splinters because the majority will be defeated by the minority out of default.  Yes, the majority (independents and Republicans) is greater than the minority (Democrats) as a voting block.  So those Democrats are hoping that, in essence, they will continue to wreak havoc with their policies and principles which continue to force the will of a minority on the majority.All of which reveals the disingenuous attitude of progressives in general.

millennia's picture

You'd better read this first before you go off half-cocked (pun intended) about how Critz's victory is good news for the prog-libs . . .  http://www.critzforcongress.com/page/nra-gives-mark-critz-a-rating

Hunter_Dan's picture

with Critz winning the election. Why? because he is a Real Democrat and Pro Life and Pro Guns. The only way the Dems will win any upcoming election is to have a Real Democrat run. You so called Progressives and Liberals are about to be kick out of the kitchen. Hope Obama endorses Shea Porter, Hodes and Shaheen so his record of endorsing liberal candidates is really lousy.

armyvet's picture

Well, well, well,As you can plainly see and with straight forward facts, real Americans are fed up with this farce of an administration and incumbents. I can hardle wait untilNov!!The emperor has backed off from supporting democratic/liberal candidates, maybe he is

  • developing new material for his stand up shout outs?Oh I mean public appearances on TV?
  • licking his wounds on getting slapped by Iran and their supports on his tuff talk on nuclear weapons?
  • scheming how to insert his socialist views into the religious sector?
  • planning his exit to join the Climate Exchange Board?
  • lecturing his insiders not to:
  1. say the US has human rights issue
  2. say they are Marxists
  3. say they are for wealth redistribution
  4. say they haven't read the bill/law
  5. say the HC farce will reduce the deficit

pjf6651's picture

Or factually challenged? Not unlike your and your fellows'  posts on climate science. Pick a topic, and you will find facts that fit your views, and never a dissenting fact uncover. Whatever happened to multiple sources and fact-checking, as well as a skeptical attitude toward any source before it is corroborated?

Bruce_Currie's picture

that the Monitor would do a story about the Pennsylvania Senate race and in the first paragraph, mention the LOSING candidate without mentioning who WON?  Well, they didn't mention him by name at least. They reffered to him as "a younger and less experienced rival." ? ? ?  

Hunter_Dan's picture

 This is the Blue Roof Monitor so not odd whatsoever.

armyvet's picture

Great idea Ranger. Hope and Change, the real Hope and Change is coming soon. NH better follow the same course. By the way, Where is Abe? Where is Pat? Where is Nashua Mike? Where is Glk? and the other posters from the so called Progressive Buckley Ilk? Tea is Great especially when you have a party with it..lol

armyvet's picture

November is on it's way. I think I'll have tea, not coffee, with my toast this morning.

Ranger's picture

It would be more fitting to go with toast, since  the Demoncrats will be toast next November 

DZ's picture
Don't miss this
Customer service: