When is Concord going to wake up, you cannot keep taxing people. People cannot afford to live now, Property taxes out of control and now you want to add more taxes just what the ecomony needs. We need casinos to bring in more money, jobs etc. You have already screwed the disabled retired employees far beyond their means, let alone other retirees.
We would like to know what benefits disabled people get from the state. we applied for food stamps, medicaid and etc we were turned down on everyone of them. We could only get $300.00 last winter for heat, boy that went far. May NH lawmakers, and the Governor make big money, but we do not and neither does most state retirees. I don't know how many times you have been told to build a larger liquor warehouse and start housing the liquor and trucking it yourself instead of paying a private co to do this in Nashua. Also get read of private consultants hired by the state. But of course as always someone has ones hand in someones pocket.

I agree with all of these posts on this "Pick your Pocket" news item. By the way, another big time Tea Party will be held at the State House Steps on July the 4th. Come and show our tax and spend crew they are on their way out of their offices including our Grass Roots (Mass.) Gov.

So Kevin http://www.revenue.nh.gov/about/commissioner.htm :

Who is your federal* tax collector?

That's right, you heard me correct. Check it out: neither the collectors, in the plural with the letter s, to call for and obtain payment of the state AND federal taxes, "shall at the same time hold the office of governor" etc.

You're now saying: Say What!? Yup: see Article 95, Part 2 of the New Hampshire Constitution: http://www.nh.gov/constitution/oaths.html for The "Incompatibility of Certain Offices" in that THIS" is distinguishable from THAT, being also: "any person holding any office under the United States".

Yeah! You thought that whenever any federal agent from Washington demands tax money from an individual it is O.K.!? No! Here in this state it is un-constitutional. Unlawful! This Article 95 was written on June 2, 1784 and even though the 16th Amendment was added to Article I, Section 8, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution for un-uniform taxes on February 25, 1913 the manner or HOW of collecting from WHO has NOT changed.

So who in this state collects FOR the Feds? Not WHO in the federal government collects FROM the citizens in this state! Look at it in this push-pull way of doing business. Who pulls from us? A state or federal officer? HOW is the federal government supposed to get their money from us? Directly? No! Indirectly through this state agent who tries to pull it from us who then pushes it to there.

And to there is WHERE? Some branch office, like the IRS in Portsmouth? Do they have our Art. I, Sec. 8, Clause 17 U.S. Constitutional "Consent"? No! There is no N.H. RSA Ch. 123:1 filing from them as required by their own Title 40 U.S. Code Section 255 that the U.S. Attorney is supposed to honor! but who operates in disgrace!

[ See: http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/IX/123/123-1.htm and http://www.oscn.net/applications/oscn/deliverdocument.asp?citeid=393575 plus http://www.usdoj.gov/usao/eousa/foia_reading_room/usam/title9/crm00664.htm respectfully also: http://www.givemeliberty.org/RTPLawsuit/Misc/PressStatementSchulz9-16-03... being: "Adams v. United States (1943) 319 US 312, 87 L Ed. 1421, 63 S. Ct. 1122. (Quoted from U.S. statute 40 USCS 255, Interpretive Note #14, citing the US Supreme Court)" of: "In view of 40 USCS 255, no jurisdiction exists in United States to enforce federal criminal laws, unless and until consent to accept jurisdiction over lands acquired by United States has been filed in behalf of United States as provided in said section, and fact that state has authorized government to take jurisdiction is immaterial." Reference our "Consent" offered on June 14, 1883, as not a gift, but for an exchange, that never happened BELIEVE IT OR NOT!

So my suggestion is that everyone who has been tricked to pay these federal taxes has been un-protected by that last sentence in Article 12, Part 1st, N.H. Constitution & Bill of Rights.[ http://www.nh.gov/constitution/billofrights.html of: "Nor are the inhabitants of this state controllable by any other laws than those to which they, or their representative body, have given their consent."] They ought to get their money back from these thieves and to the 7th degree!!!!!!! Then maybe with some bills from them to the Feds of the statement of charges, for its return, that when returned by payment thanks to your tax receiver / collector finally doing his job, that x% of such could be taxed sort of like paying a commission to a Bounty Hunter to get your own property back.

Now WHO will take the first step in contacting the State Police for their Art. 12 pro-tection at the state level for law-forcement? WHAT company CEO will say: "Enough is enough, we have stock-holders who expect us to operate according to the law, and not as to participate with "outlaws"!"

Commissioner Kevin: Please honor your N.H. R.S.A. Chapter 92:2 oath of office. http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/VI/92/92-2.htm I'll say thank you when you do your job of to oversee this collector / receiver.

Those who favor taxing the dividends distributed by LLCs refer to the measure as closing a loophole. But, your reporter and editors should know better. The dividends of LLCs are taxed prior to distribution by the Business Enterprise Tax, which was designed to tax firms that escape the Business Profits Tax by distributing their "profits" to partners. Once distributed, the dividends represent personal income. If NH taxed personal income as it should, but failed to capture such distributions, then there would be a loophole to close. But, as it stands this proposal, along with the Interest and Dividends tax on investment income, is another iniquitous means of taxing the income of some rather than all.