Editorial

Spending on sizzle instead of on steak

article tools

The events are not related and the comparison is hardly apples to apples, but the irony is too great to ignore. At the same time that the state's liquor commission is defending its use of $422,000 in federal funds to purchase and outfit a mobile command center to facilitate DWI arrests and convictions, the state's judicial system is suspending jury trials in civil cases and instituting a freeze on filling vacant judicial positions.

Like all but a few states, New Hampshire is facing a severe budget crisis. The expected deficit this year alone is estimated at $250 million.

Gov. John Lynch has asked sacrifices of everyone, but the cuts that Supreme Court Chief Justice John Broderick has suggested show how bad the situation is. The judicial system is a coequal branch of government that was under-funded before the economic downturn. When it suspends one of its essential functions for want of money, the state is in trouble.

To comply with Lynch's request for reductions to the judicial system budget, Broderick asked the governor and Executive Council not to replace Justice Richard Galway, who is retiring in February, until next summer. That would save the state $63,000. The courts are cutting back on security and leaving 12 percent of full-time judgeships vacant. The work of the courts is labor-intensive. When the workforce shrinks, securing justice takes longer. In Merrimack County, for example, the delay in scheduling civil cases will grow from its current 30 to 60 days to between 90 and 120 days.

Criminal cases should not be affected by the budget cuts, but people involved in civil disputes over contracts, property liability, auto accidents and malpractice accusations, the categories which account for a majority of trials, will have to wait longer for resolution.

Now about that mobile police van. The van, which is currently in storage, cost $355,000 plus another $67,000 for additions like a heat-seeking camera, subscriptions to satellite TV and radio service and a flat-screen TV that can be used to display evidence or to allow agents to watch the news while waiting to process drunken drivers. The van contains two cells, a bathroom and breath-testing equipment.

The mobile command center no doubt will, as liquor commissioner Mark Bodi says, improve the evidence used in court and prove useful in emergencies. But Bodi practically tied himself in knots while trying to justify its purchase during the worst economic downturn in decades. It will, for example, be helpful when educating people about the dangers of drunken driving, he said. Not while it's in storage, it won't.

President-elect Barack Obama's administration-in-waiting understands the plight of the nation's states and cities. Obama has begun to outline the massive public program he intends to use to repair the nation's neglected infrastructure, put people back to work and set the nation on an economic path that will restore long-term prosperity. Direct aid to ailing state and local governments is also under consideration.

As the suspension of jury trials in New Hampshire proves, that aid is sorely needed. But if and when - and we hope it's when - that aid comes, it should be based on priorities that don't result in funding for phenomenally expensive boondoggles like mobile command centers that go unused while court cases go unheard for want of money for judges.

Comments

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

Going Rogue

This whole thing bypassed normal channels for approval, federal grant money notwithstanding. It takes more of a robust approval process to order a computer for an employee.

Anonymous's picture

Give the cops & fire department what they need ?

Ok, but the police department didn't ask for this nor do they need the van!
The liquor commission wants this van so they can watch TV and travel the state in comfort. What a waste. States have beeen getting along just fine catching drunk drivers without this expensive van what happen to change this? Well there is federal money to spend! Read that as taxpayer

Anonymous's picture

There is no way to justify this expensive vehicle.

This is a perfect example of our government being out of control. As far as the courts budget, I don't see any lights on in them after 430pm, yet many of their employees are exempt (salaried) employees. Why? Because they are state employees and the rules apply to them, but no one has the courage to demand they get the job done within the restraints of the budget.

Anonymous's picture

A Real Joke

Why in the world has this van been given to the Liquor Commission? No one seems to be asking this question. Who is going to do more DWI enforcement..............State Police, local police, sheriff

Anonymous's picture

"President-elect Barack Obama's administration-in-waiting unders

The federal government is how many trillion dollars in debt? Everyone wants a handout from the federal government as though Uncle Sam were truly a rich uncle, independently wealthy. It seems like such an obviously elemental principle that so many choose to ignore--the IRS collects taxes from us. We give Uncle Sam money so he can give it back to us (after keeping monumental amounts in administration fees, waste, graft and favoritism). If we didn't have to give so much to the federal government, we would have more to fund New Hampshire needs. Now we are going to have to line up with 49 other states.

Debbie's picture

good joke

President-elect Barack Obama's administration-in-waiting understands the plight of the nation's states and cities.

This is funny. What Hubris! Presidents don't control the economy. They are just going to spend more money. Oh wait we don't have a balanced budget.. so go print some more.
Stop SPENDING! Stop the BAILOUTS! Stop the occupation of Iraq!

Anonymous's picture

GET OVER IT!

Give the cops and the fire department everything they need!!

Anonymous's picture

Listen next time.

Maybe the mess in NH wouldn't of been so bad If Lynch and the Dem majority listened to the independent body that predicted that the budget was unattainable. Too bad the public was duped into giving this guy another two years at the helm.

Anonymous's picture

Federal bailouts for states

Well, good-on-ya for accepting that the "mobile command center" is a "phenomenally expensive boondoggle..." but note that federal funds were used and those are usually all tied up and slotted for certain things...Or were they?

But its a bummer to think that the state needs a bailout from the Federal government. More Federal funding with more strings. Next thing you know, we'll have mandatory seatbelt and helmet laws so we can squeak another couple of Federal dollars out of the system. I'd rather the Federal government reduce the strings, or reduce my taxes, and get their sticky little fingers out of my state.

Jay_Nashua's picture

Don't miss this