The last time Hopkinton homes were assessed, droves of upset residents questioned the accuracy of much-higher appraisals and the tax spike that followed.
Three years later, property values have plunged. The town's overall value is down 17 percent. But taxes are not.
As assessors wrap up a town-wide revaluation, they say Hopkinton's tax rate will have to jump more than 21 percent over last year's to compensate for the lessened property values.
That change will be reflected in tax bills due this December. With the rate increase, "you're going to end up paying what you did last year," said Selectman George Langwasser. "Chances are your taxes are going to increase, not decrease."
Why an increase, especially since voters passed a flat budget during March's town meeting? Factors besides the reassessment could play into this winter's bills, including a teachers contract expected to come before voters during a special October meeting and costs that the state passed down to towns, such as administering a swine flu vaccine, said Selectman Scott Flood.
The town is also weighing a plan to put $433,000 toward a conservation easement for a struggling dairy farm in Contoocook, a proposal the selectmen may bring before voters this fall at a cost of $53,000 this year.
But "irrespective of anything going on in town," Flood said, December tax bills always top what residents pay in June. "You have to pay for inflation from the prior year, plus the things voted on in March town meeting," he said. "If the budget's kept flat from '08 to '09 . . . there's still going to be an increase."
While the rate increase this fall is meant to offset the revenue no longer coming from the diminished property tax base, in bills until the next revaluation, "people's taxes are going to be hit hard," Flood said. "If your business wants to expand, which we desperately need . . . or all of a sudden, I do something to my house, I'm paying that higher rate."
This round of revaluations has been a three-year process that began shortly after the one finished in 2006, which prompted public outcry. Residents reported numerous inaccuracies in their assessments: Three-quarter cellars were listed as full. Buildings were described as carpeted when only one room was. Sheds that didn't exist were marked down on property cards.
Those errors happened while using software from the company Avitar, which used different categorizations than the software employed by the town in the past, Langwasser said.
The end result was a revaluation that drove property values up by 22 to 23 percent, assessors reported. About 400 homeowners requested abatements, "which is really unheard of," Langwasser said. "That's a figure we can't live with."
To remedy the situation, the town began anew with a different company, Purvis & Associates. Assessors from that company handled the hundreds of abatement requests, then started to measure and check homes throughout town, attempting to get inside the homes whenever possible.
Langwasser said the town mailed all homeowners their property cards earlier this month and set up a telephone number for residents to call if they wanted to discuss their revised appraisal with an assessor.
"The real goal," he said, "is to make sure that every property in this town is assessed correctly."
But some in town are questioning whether that's happening. At a selectmen's meeting Monday night, resident Laura Morgan said the assessors hadn't done thorough interior inspections.
"I've asked three times, when are the interiors of the homes in Hopkinton going to be visited?" Morgan said. "I don't know anybody whose house has been inspected in the interior."
Assessor Steve Allen told the board that if homeowners weren't around during a property visit, his company performed an outside appraisal and then sent a notice, asking residents to call and set up an appointment for an interior inspection. About 1,200 letters were sent, he said. (next page »)
BOSTON (AP) -- Officials in New England's coastal areas…
NASHUA, N.H. (AP) -- William Smart, who was devastated…
BANGOR, Maine (AP) -- Two men are free on bail after…
FRANCESTOWN, N.H. (AP) -- A New Hampshire fire chief…
Comments
Low Income Housing
By blueboy - 08/21/2009 - 9:05 pmAs a Concord resident I would like to see Hopkinton build some low income housing. Hopkinton needs to help out.
to vote
CHANGE
By DZ - 08/20/2009 - 6:37 pmWelcome to CHANGE WE CAN BELIEVE IN. All these wealthy land owners should be honored to fulfill their patriotic duty and pay those taxes. Everyone else needs a hand up.
to vote
How very sad
By Robert Frypp - 08/20/2009 - 7:32 pm...really, is there nothing else you can obsess about?
to vote
(snore)
By Michael57 - 08/20/2009 - 6:45 pmAnother right-winger trying to turn this non-political non-story into some kind of attack on Obama and the Democrats. Yawn. Wake me up when this guy realizes what the point of the story is: that taxes in Hopkinton are not going up.
to vote
Wake Up
By DZ - 08/21/2009 - 5:02 pmSorry my sarcasim may have pit you to sleep. I'm not exactly a right-winger but do lean in that direction. Then again a member of the Obama administration did saw the patriotic duty line, and Obama himself used the hand up statement, al;ong with targeting the so called "wealthy" with higher taxes. And was the whole point of the story TAXES and how the rate was going up? And what are the taxes used for, the government, which I do believe is a political entity?
Sorry for staying something you may disagree with, guess that makes me a racist.
Nice NON STORY, front page above the fold.
to vote
small clarification
By RealNHGOPer - 08/21/2009 - 8:56 amThe taxes in Hopkinton are not going up BECAUSE of assessing.
The town side is flat.
However the state tax, county tax and school tax 'may' go up slightly. (or to be fair down slightly)
You are correct. Critize Obama/(Bush) for things that they do or propose but not every issue involves them.
to vote
Care to verify your proclamation?
By C. dog e. doGy - 08/20/2009 - 7:52 pmI mucked about in the town's web site for way too long searching for those yearly budget numbers you thought would be a good idea to have for some old-fashioned comparison and contrasting. Given this isn't my holy grail, I moved on to more entertaining pursuits, but maybe you could fulfill your own wish. Based on the information I could find, it does appear the budgets, they keep a goin' up, which likely would surprise no one here. Wakey, wakey, Mikey!
- C. dog anticipates more snews from the Lib wing of the comment board
to vote
who knows?
By Michael57 - 08/21/2009 - 9:28 amObviously I don't know and neither do you. Someone who lives in the town just needs to go to the town office and look it up, that's all. Or: perhaps if there were reporters who were interested in reporting the actual facts here, instead of just revisiting the story about the valuations and getting everybody all hopped up, she or he could do the digging for us.
to vote
Information under-load
By C. dog e. doGy - 08/21/2009 - 9:41 amDon't you think it odd that they have the menu of what little Suzy Q will have for lunch 3 months out on that internet web thingy, but not the taxes confiscated by this political construct for the past ? years. It almost seems like they're trying not to draw attention to this sordid little matter.
And yes, the planets aligned once again, and I agree that some investigative reporting would be refreshing on this and other topics.
- C. dog
to vote
Inflammatory headline
By Michael57 - 08/20/2009 - 3:45 pmNow that I think of it, this headline is pretty inflammatory and misleading. It would have been just as accurate to use "Hopkinton taxes held steady: new assessments and tax rates calculated". I guess the Monitor is more NY Post than NY Times sometimes.
to vote
Thanks Mike I get it
By snoopey - 08/20/2009 - 2:13 pmThanks Mike I get it now.
The tax rate means nothing, it is the budget that means everything!!!
So no matter what the rate is, taxes will always go up up up in Hopkinton because the budget goes up, up ,up. Where else but Hopkinton can a Town spend over $200,000 in salary and benefits and make a claim that it has no impact on the tax rate?
No where, because it is ONLY Hopkinton where the tax rate is irrelevant.
I get it now, does that make me a Liberal???
Oh, and if Hopkinton posted a chart of the expenditures and did it honestly you would see unlevel funding. A few Years ago a Department budget would contain everything from salary, to phone expenses, to insurances to cost of heating and electricity for their respective building. Now, it is moved all over the place so as to confuse. Have the Selectmen lay out the exact cost of running each department and you will be surprised at the very least. I would love to see it spelled out so us simple folk can understand, spell out exactly what is spent to run the town by department with each department's expenditures laid out 100%.
to vote
I don't think you do get it
By Michael57 - 08/20/2009 - 2:38 pmThis has nothing to do with politics. Why are you talking about liberalism?
The question is not what the tax rate is but what your tax bill is. Let me illustrate with a simple example. If you owe a guy 20 bucks, and you have two tens, your "reach into your pocket" rate is two. If you have four fives, your rate is four. The rate is double if you have four fives, but it doesn't matter, because the amount you are about to pay stays the same. That's what I mean when I say the rate doesn't matter. It's what you owe that matters.
Is your tax bill going up or staying roughly the same? That's the question. And then that is based on whether your town's spending is going up or not and what its sources of funding are. This is pretty straightforward and has nothing to do with liberal vs. conservative politics.
You are correct that a look at the budget by department would be helpful. I do not live in Hopkinton--but if you do, perhaps you could go and look at the numbers and let us know.
Regarding the point about equalized valuations, Hopkinton is a little high but is not through the roof, as an earlier commenter suggested. It is lower than Bow and Henniker and a little higher than Canterbury, to take three towns close by. It is about the same as Warner. Here's the link to the most recent valuations (I think):
http://www.ed.state.nh.us/education/data/ReportsandStatistics/FinancialR...
to vote
Why would any outsiders move to Hopkinton?
By DRK - 08/20/2009 - 12:53 pmWhy would any outsiders move to Hopkinton when the equalized tax rate is through the roof? Move to a lower tax town and fight to keep it that way. Stay informed about local spending issues.
to vote
Tax rate is irrelevant
By Michael57 - 08/20/2009 - 12:37 pmIt isn't the rate that's important, it's what the town budget is and what your share of it is.
to vote
That's right
By rje49 - 08/20/2009 - 2:45 pmIn NH, the town simply takes the amount of money they want to spend and divides by the evaluation of their taxpayers homes to get the "new" rate. It has nothing to do with how much properties are really worth, as they've been telling you all along. I could see this coming, with the drop in home values. Know which town has the highest property tax rate in the state? Berlin. Why? Because houses are cheap, but the town still needs their money! You know what I'm getting at... a state that relys on income taxes instead of property taxes needs a legislative vote and Governor's approval to increase rates, and a vote to increase isn't popular with the folks who elected them.
But we are so smart in NH....
to vote
Yes it will...new rates are
By b1rdman - 08/20/2009 - 12:26 pmYes it will...new rates are calculated every hear. That's why the rate is always posted after the valuation.
It's a shell game.
to vote
Governors 3 million dollar house
By pat00xxx - 08/20/2009 - 11:56 amI wonder how much his house will be taxed ?
to vote
The math, do the math, the math, the math
By snoopey - 08/20/2009 - 10:59 amYou are all dummies, did you not understand what you read.......blah blah
Why can't the tax rate DECREASE? 21%, level, flat, the same, more, a little more, ALOT more but never less, what you mean Willis; less????????.
The assessments are down but they still value my home worth alot more than I could EVER sell it. My Company is making less money so they should raise their prices 21% to break even, it is the tax rate but not the tax bill and my assessment is down but I am paying the same as when my home was worth 100 grand more, huh, what, what, WHY?
I am confused, we are confused, you are not confused BUT just pay the darn bill. 10 years ago we had a full time Police Chief with part time Officers that did the same quality work for half the price and never once did they get the Town sued. They kept the Town safe, very safe in a Town the very same size, how did they do that???? We had Fire Chiefs elected by the members of the Fire Department and managed to put out fires, save lives and do it all for a lot less. But wait; we need the Chief to be full time to supervise all the new construction in Town, HUH??? But I thought John Pianka agreed to do this part time. Yes times have changed, now we employ a Part time Police Chief who only works when he can ride the Motorcycles and earns more than 70 grand, NOW, a full time Fire Chief at over 70 grand (in a Town that only needs a part time Police Chief, go figure) for a Town that has but only a few calls a year (Our Hopkinton Fire Chief earns per call money higher than most FD's in the nation I bet), a Farm that wants the Town to pay for but allow the Farm owners to farm the land for free and keep it undeveloped eventhough NO ONE has ever beeen interested in the land other than to farm it.
Yup, I wonder what the tax rate WOULD have been if Hopkinton cut the blubber out of their blubberous budget. Who knows, maybe an increase of NO percent????
to vote
It's simple; they lied.
By rje49 - 08/20/2009 - 2:50 pmThey've been lying all along! Your tax rate doesn't go up or down according to your property value. It goes up because they need more money! I saw this situation coming; I've been waiting to see the outrage, when values go down, but taxes go up... and here it is.
to vote
Another one who doesn't understand the story
By Michael57 - 08/20/2009 - 3:33 pmThe point of this article is that taxes will go up in Hopkinton, on average, less than half of one percent.
to vote
Yes I do
By rje49 - 08/20/2009 - 4:28 pmIf your taxes are accessed on the value of your property, and the value goes down, then why didn't your taxes? I understand what they are juggling, but it simply ISN'T what they say it is.
to vote
You're making a simple situation seem tricky
By Michael57 - 08/20/2009 - 4:57 pmThey have a certain amount of money they need to operate the town. Everyone pays a share. Right now (and to my mind this is an awful system, I think we agree) the only way your fair share is determined is by how much your real estate is assessed for. If, in your town, only your property value went down--and your neighbors' stayed the same--then your taxes would indeed go down--and theirs would go up slightly. But if everyone's assessed value goes down the same percentage, then it's simple math that everyone's overall taxes have to stay the same. It's because the town still needs the same amount of money.
to vote
It would be helpful
By Michael57 - 08/20/2009 - 12:56 pmIt would be helpful if someone could post a chart of the past 5 years' budgets for Hopkinton so we could all take a look at it. Are they holding spending level or not?
to vote
That's right. It ain't
By bandbox - 08/20/2009 - 10:32 amThat's right. It ain't rocket science: Assessed valuations down, mil rate up. Assessed valuations up, mil rate down.
to vote
It's all in the math
By cavman35 - 08/20/2009 - 10:17 amFor years the people of New Hampshire have been complacent about their property taxes and their assessments. Most towns did a reassessment once every ten years. That did not matter until the late 90's and the sudden escalation in home prices. Now all you hear is complaints about just about anything being built any place that a person can see , hear or smell will depress the value of their house. When the housing market rolled along strong everyone started seeing their house as an equity bank so they took out money against it and talked about how much it was worth. If houses were sold they often went for 2 or 3 times their current tax value so law suits came about and towns now had to do reassessments more often. Here in Henniker we had our first reassessment in 10 years and people choked on the new assessed values but it halved our tax rate.
Now what happens is exactly what I saw when I lived in Virginia for 22 years while they had rampant growth. Every year they automatically assessed the value of everyone's property based upon sales of homes that year. If the average sale of all homes in the county was 10% higher than the current property values then everyone's assessment went up 10 percent but the property tax stayed flat or even dropped. If all the sales prices were 10% less than the current property values then everyone's assessed value went down by 10% but guess what the total bill to operate the county was still the same so the property tax went up to make up the difference. The end result was your total tax stayed about the same. It became a game because the year all the property values went up the politicians would tout the fact they had kept the property tax rate flat or even dropped it a few cents. The years the property values went down they cut back all services drastically so the complaints would force them to reinstate portions of the budget that had been cut but it would require an increase in the tax rate. The end result was the overall property tax that you paid was the same. The trouble here in New Hampshire is we don't do yearly adjustments so it is a big slam every time it is done.
By the way because the state of Virginia is not reliant upon property tax to pay all of it's bills because they have a 5% income tax. The house I used to have in Virginia is assessed at almost $100,000 more than my current house here in Henniker but the tax bill this year for the Virginia house is about $1,400 while my bill here is over $6,500
to vote
Massachusetts taxes
By thrifty - 08/20/2009 - 1:33 pmMassachusetts always points to New Hampshire's high property taxes when the lack of income or sales tax subject comes up. I'm paying $4000 property tax on a $130,000 house and 5.25% income tax and 6.25% sales tax in Massachusetts. The towns down here want houses to turn over in ownership every 8-10 years to keep property values high and taxes increasing.
**********************
Liberalism is a mental disorder!
to vote
Needed: "Scarecrow" tactics!
By JosephSHaas - 08/20/2009 - 11:44 amYup, We need that Virginia legislation up here:
Of: "Virginia Farm Bureau - Farm Use Tax" at: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XDvn3Oabh3I [ 2:24 minutes 267 views @ 0:29 = "cows don't go to school"*]
* neither does my "scarecrow"** of my #____ acre garden. For me to pay for somebody else's kinder-garten?! O.K., but only for those who "need" it. http://www.friedrichfroebel.com/ and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Friedrich_Fr%C3%B6bel
** It's time for Scarecrow action! (;-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ach4lJercFc "The Scarecrow of Romney Marsh" by Walt Disney of 2:11 minutes 1,029 views. And not this: http://www.wordinfo.info/words/index/info/view_unit/258
See: http://www.city-data.com/forum/new-hampshire/294135-can-anyone-explain-c... for the example of "current use", but that ONLY applicable to 10+ acres in N.H. by RSA Ch. 79-A according to http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Current_use over to http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-V-79-A.htm
It's time for the $50,000 per property as your RSA Ch. 480:1 homestead to be deducted up front from the tax bills! http://www.gencourt.state.nh.us/rsa/html/NHTOC/NHTOC-XLIX-480.htm See also http://www.uslegalforms.com/realestate/homestead/ for the list of other states too.
So for some N.H. State Rep. to file an LSR to a House Bill #___ this Fall for Year 2010 legislation of to increase the homestead $amount to: $125,000 like Nevada, and for the urban land of UP TO ten (10) acres like they do in Texas. Then we WILL have a tax based on income to a certain degree in that the industrial and commercial properties will pay more for what the government currently spends, and so to have their stockholders = us, at the Annual Meetings telling them HOW to reduce these expenses by frugality!
to vote
But in VA
By RealNHGOPer - 08/20/2009 - 10:18 amthey have sales tax
income tax
personal property tax
How much do those add up to?
Plus in VA you can't change your property tax. In NH you can at the town meeting.
to vote
ding ding ding
By RealNHGOPer - 08/20/2009 - 9:29 amYES!
Michael exactly right... you got it.
Most people don't get that.
The rate is not really what matters..... it is the total tax you PAY.
to vote
Reason vs. rhetoric
By Michael57 - 08/20/2009 - 8:57 amThe choice is: do you want to assemble as many actual facts as you can and apply math and logic to see what the situation is, or do you just want to cram every situation into your preconceived liberal vs. conservative vs. libertarian perspective and just start typing zingers? Shame on everyone who thought that this story was about a 21% tax increase and started ranting about Souter and Lynch and Dems and the story going national, etc. I've seen a lot of you in the health care forums, by the way, displaying a similar lack of understanding.
Luv Gov from the mouths of morons, indeed. Math is math. No one has to "convince" you that 2+2=4, or that .83 x 1.21=1.0043. It always will, even if you want to try to make this about the wealthy cosmopolitan elites of Contoocook or whatever.
to vote
Ranting, zingers, preconceived perspectives....
By Robert Frypp - 08/20/2009 - 9:10 amThank you for pointing this repetitive garbage out Michael57, I couldn't have said it better myself. I was thinking of replying to these habitual trouble makers (who don't even live in the affected area this story is about) as well, but it typically equates to wasted time, nothing more.
to vote
reading
By RealNHGOPer - 08/20/2009 - 9:32 amI wonder if some of the people in this thread even read the article about how the tax rate is figured.
Also Selectman Flood is WRONG. The town portion of the tax rate was level. So there is no increase at all in the town side of the tax rate. Inflation has nothing to do with it.
to vote
Will this start the Great Brie and Chablis revolt of 2009?
By Joshtiffany - 08/20/2009 - 8:56 amWill this start the Great Brie and Chablis revolt of 2009?
to vote
Flatsy Patsy Peaks in Hopkington
By C. dog e. doGy - 08/20/2009 - 8:34 amTypical Love Gov Speak once again from the mouths of morons.
Just at the same moment they try to convince you only the rate is going up, not your actual total tax bill, they also tell us a "flat budget" ain't so flat after all. Why, in fact, it's got quite a pitch to it, Joe and Suzy taxpayer. First, we got the inflation adjuster over there, then we gots to have the latest and greatest in fire safety in the form of a new bloated position, and we can't let someone buy the farm over there because it would just ruin Buffy's view of the river, and we all know to sustain this "quality education" for the chil'ren we need to keep payin' the "teachers" more and more money while we make less and less.
Go figure, all this starts to add up to real money, and before you know it, a flat budget starts to look more like a double-diamond ski slope. Maybe lil' Jimmy should pull out his protractor and measure just how flat flat is in Hopkington.
- C. dog prefers the peaks on the White Mts to that of the liberal low-lands
to vote
More Clues
By Abu - 08/21/2009 - 8:01 amThanks C dog. Hope my ski tow doesn't get taxed.
to vote
Do you even live in New England?
By Michael57 - 08/20/2009 - 9:50 amWhether it's in NH or MA, it's spelled "Hopkinton."
to vote
It's an intentional misspelling
By Robert Frypp - 08/20/2009 - 10:38 amit's his un-clever way of trying to be clever...to himself. Search the 'David Souter moves to Hopkinton' stories in the Monitor for the misspelling's last hilarious appearance.
to vote
Wow
By Michael57 - 08/20/2009 - 10:55 amThe comic stylings of C Dog ... good night everybody ... don't forget to tip your waitress...
to vote
Don't you guys get it?
By Michael57 - 08/20/2009 - 8:08 amThe tax RATE is going up to compensate for lower assessments. Your tax BILL will be about the same.
Get out your calculators. A 17% drop in assessments means that the normal base will be .83 of the previous rate. .83 times 1.21 (the increase) equals 1.0043. In other words, the normal tax increase described by this article is less than half of one percent.
to vote
Of course I get it
By LIAMD2 - 08/20/2009 - 9:36 amI am a Hopkinton taxpayer (oh my, that heathen lives in Hopkinton, gasp) and my valuation came in the other day. My property was valued lower. I get. I get. It's funny how the people asking if I (or we) get it are also the same people that said "Bush only cut taxes for the rich". For the record, Bush cut taxes for those that paid taxes. Those that paid more, kept more under Bush's plan. Liberalism is a mental disorder.
to vote
Liberalism IS a mental disorder...
By Candy-O - 08/20/2009 - 12:09 pm...but not to worry Michael57 - I'm sure the treatment will be taken care of by Obamacare.
to vote
DSM-IV
By Michael57 - 08/20/2009 - 12:35 pmFunny, I looked in the index of the DSM-IV, and I didn't find liberalism anywhere. There are plenty of entries concerning delusional thinking that you and your right-wing pals might find illuminating, though.
to vote
Classic
By Michael57 - 08/20/2009 - 10:07 amTake a mundane non-debate about small town taxes, twist it so it somehow becomes an argument about national events seven years ago, and then pronounce out of the blue (along with Michael "Weiner" Savage) that "liberalism is a mental disorder." Please see my comment below about reason vs. rhetoric and cramming stories into preconceived perspectives, ranting, etc.
to vote
forcing out the unwashed masses
By LIAMD2 - 08/20/2009 - 7:19 amSounds like a purge is going on. I guess Gov Lynch and Supreme Justice Souter don't want to see guys in "wife beater" t-shirts or gals with tattoos in their quaint little town. It's funny that when Democrats are in control the little guy gets punished.
to vote
Feel the difference
By C. dog e. doGy - 08/20/2009 - 8:17 amBut they really, really feel bad when they're doing it. And isn't that what really counts when ringing one's hands over one's mid-morning latt
to vote
No problemo
By Robert Frypp - 08/20/2009 - 9:12 amWhat's so unusual about this increase? I know the raise I get at work every year is at least a 21% rate increase, annually. How about everyone else? That's a typical salary increase for most here, isn't it?
I realize this is a 'tax rate' increase and not a total 'tax bill' increase, but tell you what, you guys are going to need more than seat belts. You better have front and side airbags, crash helmets, goggles and leathers donned when the flat budget hammer falls at this year's end because most regular folks in town are looking for a little relief...somewhere, anywhere, and delivering on the flat budget would have provided it for many.
to vote
twenty-one percent!!
By snoopey - 08/20/2009 - 6:26 amSure, lets save money by making the POlice Chief position part time and having them cruise around on motorcycles. Lets make the fire Chief's popsition full time at a cost of near $80,000 with benefits added. Lets run out and buy the development rights to the Bohanan farm at a bargain basement cost of $435,000. Let us buy this, fund that, add policemen, Firemen, Paramedics, buy Ladder trucks, buy the new Fire Chief a new Fire Chief car, build a new Community center, add and renovate the school buildings and fix the Town hall and do this all with a small increase in taxes of about TWENTY-ONE (21%) percent!!
Then next year lets do it all again, but be much more frugal so that our taxes increase only 15% in 2011.
Hey, my house is fot sale by the owner; the BANK!!!!
to vote
National Attention
By Dick Pender - 08/20/2009 - 6:21 amI just picked upped that this is going National .. Lets see what happens now. This will put the microscope on all the Elected Town Officials. Good luck Hopkinton.
to vote
taxation without representation
By sailmaker - 08/20/2009 - 5:54 amI own property there but will never live there again. Now I have to pay whatever they want to confiscate because I cant vote there even on simple local tax or zoning measures......the system stinks
to vote
SOMETHING DOESN'T SOUND RIGHT
By Dick Pender - 08/20/2009 - 4:26 amIf I were a property owner in this Town, I would be outraged at the Smoke and Mirrors being used here. Something just doesn't sound right. We feel the Taxpayers of this town. You need to recall every elected person and start anew. You need to start an investigation as to the specifics as how this 21% increase was allowed to happen. Looks like the only people that will be left in town will be Doctors, Lawyers, Crooks and Mr. Souter.
to vote