Grieving families want GM prosecuted for defects
Criminal charges an uncertainty
FILE - In this Tuesday, April 1, 2014, file photo families of victims of a General Motors safety defects in small cars hold photos of their loved ones as they gather on the lawn on Capitol Hill in Washington. Families of those who died in General Motors cars with defective ignition switches want prosecutors to go after GM insiders responsible for letting the problems fester for more than decade, and perhaps for covering them up. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
The families of those who died in General Motors cars with defective ignition switches want prosecutors to go after GM insiders responsible for letting the problems fester for more than a decade – and perhaps for covering them up.
“The only way the public is going to be protected from this negligence by companies is if there will ultimately be prison sentences,” said Leo Ruddy of Scranton, Pa., whose 21-year-old daughter Kelly was killed in 2010 when her Chevrolet Cobalt veered inexplicably off the highway and crashed.
Family members attended hearings in Washington, D.C., last week that stoked those sentiments. Lawmakers confronted GM CEO Mary Barra with what they said was evidence that, in 2006, a company employee intentionally tried to conceal the switch problem. And the head of the nation’s auto safety watchdog said GM withheld critical information that connected the failing switch to air bags that didn’t deploy in a crash.
“I don’t see this as anything but criminal,” said Sen. Kelly Ayotte, a Republican from New Hampshire and former state prosecutor.
However, even if an employee or employees did conceal information, it’s uncertain whether they would be charged with a crime. Legal experts say it’s easier to prove wrongdoing by a corporation than by individuals. The internal documents that can be used to build a case against the company might be inadmissible as evidence against individuals. And it can be hard to prove that individuals knowingly made false statements.
The Justice Department didn’t bring charges against anyone last month when it closed an investigation of Toyota.
GM has acknowledged that in 2004 and 2005, engineers submitted proposals to fix the switches in Cobalts, Saturn Ions and other small cars, but the fixes were never implemented. GM says upper management only became aware of the problem last year. A recall of the cars, now up to 2.6 million, began in February.
On Wednesday, Sen. Claire McCaskill, a Democrat from Missouri, accused one GM employee of a coverup. Ray DeGiorgio, the lead switch engineer on the Cobalt, said in a deposition last year for a lawsuit against GM that he never approved a change to the ignition switch.
But McCaskill produced a document from GM’s switch supplier that showed DeGiorgio signed off on a replacement, but with the same part number. Failing to change a part number makes the part harder to track.
Appearing yesterday on ABC’s This Week, McCaskill said, “There is no reason to keep the same part number unless you’re trying to hide the fact that you’ve got a defective switch out there that in fact ended up killing a number of people on our highways.”
Paul Rothstein, a Georgetown University law professor, wouldn’t speak specifically about DeGiorgio but said someone “caught in a lie” could be more vulnerable to individual prosecution.
Barra called the failure to change the part number “unacceptable.” She said the company has not yet fired any employees in connection with the recall. But she said if inappropriate decisions were made, GM will take action, including firing those involved.
Barra said at the hearing that DeGiorgio still works at GM.
The company declined to make him available for an interview.
“If you can go to jail for insider trading and things like that, which is just making money, if you do something that caused a loss of life . . . (the penalty) should be more than just a few dollars,” said Ken Rimer, whose stepdaughter died in a 2006 accident after a faulty switch prevented air bags from deploying.