House to form special committee to probe Benghazi attacks
The House voted yesterday to form a 12-member committee to investigate the Obama administration’s handling of the 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, that killed four Americans.
In a 233-186 vote – which fell largely along party lines, with Republicans overwhelmingly in support – the House voted to form the select committee, which will be led by Rep. Trey Gowdy, a South Carolina Republican. Several Democrats voted in favor of forming the panel.
Top House Democrats, who accuse the GOP of reviving their outrage about the attacks in an effort to mobilize their voter base before the fall midterm elections, had urged their members to vote against it.
Speaker John Boehner, an Ohio Republican, is expected to name the other Republican members of the committee today. It is unclear whether Democrats will participate.
The formation of the panel, announced last week by Boehner, has been marred by partisan bickering.
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, a California Democrat, had asked that the committee membership be split 50-50, but House Republican leaders instead structured the panel with seven Republicans and five Democrats.
That fueled speculation that Democrats would decline to participate, with Rep. James Clyburn of South Carolina, a member of the Democratic House leadership, saying, “I’m not bringing a noose to my hanging.”
Meanwhile, Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee Chairman Steve Israel of New York has privately advised Democrats that it would be wise to boycott the committee, prompting calls from several top Democrats for the party to boycott the panel altogether.
But the public rhetoric regarding the committee has softened as the week has progressed, with several prominent Democrats saying yesterday that they are open to participating on the panel, at least partly.
“I will support the leader with whatever she does, I respect her judgment,” said Rep. Elijah Cummings of Maryland, speaking to reporters before the vote.
“I think it’s outrageous that they want to, after four or five committees holding hearings on this issue, create another one,” said Rep. Henry Waxman, a California Democrat who has argued in Democratic caucus meetings in favor of participating on the panel. “If there is one created, I think the Democrats ought to be there.”
Republican aides, who say that GOP House leaders want the committee to be perceived as legitimate and not overtly political, have continually insisted that they think the Democrats will take part in some way.
“This doesn’t need to be, shouldn’t be and will not be a partisan process,” Boehner said in a speech from the House floor before the vote. “Four Americans died at the hands of terrorists in a well-coordinated assault, and we will not take any shortcuts to the truth, accountability or justice. And we will not allow any sideshows that distract us from those goals. Our system of government depends on transparency and accountability. And either we do this well or we face the terrifying prospect of our people having less knowledge and less power over their own government. We owe it to future generations to make the right choice.”
House Republicans, meanwhile, are eager to participate. More than a dozen have said in interviews this week that they want to be named to the committee, and many of the caucus members have petitioned the leadership to be considered for one of the seven GOP slots.
“There’s been about 206 members that have asked to be on it,” Rep. Lynn Westmoreland, a Georgia Republican, said in an interview Wednesday.