Hi 27° | Lo 4°

Editorial: In Concord, the future of parking is now

Concord’s supposedly self-supporting parking fund is facing insolvency, and the city’s parking garages have become not a break-even proposition but a drain. The city council has rightly decided to get expert outside help to figure out what to do, albeit at a cost of $115,000. The consultants’ report is supposed to reach the council next year, when the parking fund is expected to run $78,000 in the red.

We hope the consulting company, Nelson Nygaard and Desman Associates, consider the following factors, among others, as they analyze the situation.

Millennials, people roughly 18 to 34, tend not see car ownership as a necessity or cars as a symbol of status and independence. They consider them a pain in the butt. The “see the USA in your Chevrolet” era is over.

Though it’s not happening in Concord yet, young people, when they need a vehicle, rent one from one of the many car-share businesses now available in bigger cities. When cars are shared and kept in use rather than parked for most of the day, the need for parking spaces diminishes.

Driverless cars, along with vans, shuttles and buses, exist now. Google has racked up 300,000 miles with its driverless cars without an accident. A driverless car reached the top of Pikes Peak and a fleet of driverless vans traveled 8,000 miles from Italy to China. Volvo has designed a car that can drop off a passenger at a preset destination, park itself where told and come back when called. We believe that use of driverless vehicles will be routine in urban areas within a decade.

Urban real estate, particularly if the trend of moving from the suburbs to the city continues, will be too expensive to be used for parking lots. Clinton Street, for example, sees a steady stream of cars from the bedroom communities to the west during the morning and evening commutes. Those cars require an enormous amount of space to house.

Driverless shuttles to carry riders from remote parking lots where real estate is cheap to stops in Concord would free up an enormous amount of parking space. So would driverless cars that drop their owner off and park in a remote Concord lot and return when called.

Car ownership is expensive, particularly considering that cars spend an estimated 98 percent of their time parked. Driverless taxies and rental companies like Zipcar will make it easy for city residents to forego car ownership.

Driverless vans and buses, along with advances in power systems, electric and otherwise, will make it cheaper to expand public transportation. Such factors will cut into the demand for parking spaces and garages.

Once such alternatives are in place, cities should, and some already are, drive commuters to alternatives by making parking more expensive. Some planners say parking garages should be built with the knowledge that some of them will be re-purposed as office space or apartments.

We share city Councilor Alan Bennett’s amazement at the lack of a maintenance plan for the city’s parking garages. They are a major city investment. Just one of them, the Durgin Block garage next to the YMCA, was found to be in need of roughly $3.3 million in repairs, $1.4 million of which has already been spent.

The garages must be maintained, but the plan for their future should include the possibility that they will become less used, less necessary and more expensive for the city to own. The future of cars, and parking, even in Concord, is on the cusp of change.

Legacy Comments3

Not sure all this futuristic driverless vehicle mumbo-jumbo applies to Concord just yet. At this juncture, I'd attribute lack of car ownership amongst the 18-34 age group with lack of jobs for which to buy and maintain them. That's a vicious cycle, of course (can't get a job without a car; can't get a car without a job...repeat & fade). FWIW, the parking garage next to the YMCA is the Firehouse garage; not the Durgin Block garage. Latter is located on Durgin Block, which is across the street from the 'Y', and behind Centerpoint Church.

Nygaard focuses on urban development that promotes bicycling and walking mode share. Their designs avoid parking spaces as they feel more parking spaces create more traffic and they favor green designs. Desman does do parking surveys, but they mostly build garages and renovate old ones, Like turn them into other uses like apts. Millennials in thriving urban areas do not need cars. They have access to mass transit like subways, etc. In Concord we need a car to get to work or shop. We are not a thriving urban area. Our downtown is boutique shops, and restaurants etc. How many folks bike to work? Young folks who stay in Concord work on Loudon Rd or possibly in health care. We do not have a lot of industry that keeps college grads here like tech companies, or a thriving urban area with arts and high incomes. We have a lot of hair salons, chineese food restaurants, pizza joints etc. I thought we already paid for the design of downtown. We know the garages need maintenance. None of this has anything to do with why downtown is not used. The planners have lobster tastes on a hot dog income The garages are not making money, and downtown shops are struggling. Evidently the planners have no clue who lives here, their incomes, and their habits. So lets spend another 100 grand to be told what we already know.

Everyday the Concord tyrant democrats that oversee their fiefdom insult the citizens intelligence. When are the real citizens going to up-rise and throw this awful bunch out on the street. Unfortunately, by that time, the overlords will have beautified big business Main Street beyond belief and built themselves mausoleums to their egos while the neighborhoods that the citizen taxpayers habitat will continue to deteriorate. Go take a look at "A" street to see what I mean.

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.