M/cloudy
73°
M/cloudy
Hi 80° | Lo 59°

Editorial: Conservation funding must be restored

Some very worthy local projects, including the restoration of Dunbarton’s town hall in time for the community’s 250th anniversary, failed to make the cut for funding from the state Land and Community Heritage Investment Program, which is itself on life support. Other also-rans included grants to speed the restoration of Epsom’s picturesque meeting house; rescuing Hillsboro’s magnificent Fuller Library, the mansion that was once home to New Hampshire governor John B. Smith; and restoring the historic clock overlooking Suncook’s Main Street. This is no way to support New Hampshire’s history, preserve a legacy for its children or protect the economy of a tourist state. The next governor and Legislature should restore full funding to LCHIP, one of the most popular programs in state history.

Repeated raids on the program’s allegedly dedicated fund left it with only enough money to keep the office lights on. The program was only able to award the grants it recently did because past recipients returned a half-million dollars they didn’t use. Had they returned the money sooner, we’re convinced, lawmakers would have stolen it too. The 18 communities that did receive grants received only a fraction of the money they requested, and hundreds of worthy grant proposals have gone unfilled. That’s pound-foolish, since every state dollar given to LCHIP has been multiplied at least five times by local and federal funds and private contributions.

The program, founded in 2000 with bipartisan support and back slaps all around, accomplished a lot until times got tough and lawmakers, lacking the courage to confront the state’s structural deficit, turned covetous eyes on LCHIP’s small pool of money. The program leveraged state money so successfully that it succeeded in preserving more than a quarter-million acres and 126 historic buildings.

It’s past time for the House, Senate and governor to have an honest, public discussion of the use of dedicated funds and the responsibility lawmakers owe the citizens who pay into them. LCHIP’s fund was not the only one raided. Money from the gas tax, which in New Hampshire is constitutionally dedicated to highway spending, has for years been diverted for purposes tangentially related to highways. Funds from fees levied on boaters and sportsmen to increase access to the state’s lakes and ponds has been misappropriated by lawmakers. So has money for motorcycle training and safety and for tobacco cessation programs. Lawmakers also raided the energy conservation fund created by New Hampshire’s participation in the regional compact to reduce greenhouse gases. That’s a breach of faith that, unless repaired, should make taxpayers unwilling to swallow future assurances about how their money will be used.

LCHIP’s primary source of revenue is a $25 surcharge on the recording of deeds and mortgages that lawmakers approved in 2007. The fee, championed by conservative Republican Rep. Neal Kurk of Weare, raised about $6 million per year for the program. The collapse of the real estate market cut into that source of revenue, but the fee still raised a considerable sum. Had lawmakers not swiped the money, LCHIP could have taken advantage of low construction and real estate costs to protect and restore much of what makes New Hampshire a great place to live. That opportunity was lost.

No set of lawmakers has succeeded in building a lockbox strong enough to resist the picks of their hungry successors. The best lockbox we’ve been able to come up with is the ballot box. If a governor, senator or representative diverts money raised for one purpose to another use, voters should call them on it. If they don’t like the answer they get, they should turn them out of office.

If these projects are so dear to heart to the individual towns - why are those towns not doing it? Why do they stand with their hand out looking for everyone else the state and country to pay for their town....... Good luck on that "them out of office" thought, that would be all of them, City, State and Federal.

It's called the COMMON GOOD. Most everyone understands that it is their responsibility to help pay for those things that makes our state special which in turn attracts visitors to the state who will spend their vacation money here. This logic would say that the states with National Parks should be the only ones to pay for them. What a selfish, stingy attitude.

I agree with Jim and I think you are missing his point. Most people agree that state properties and lands should be supported by the state and in turn this helps to attract visitors to the state and helps the economy. However, to Jim's point, these projects are not owned by the state of NH, but local municipalities. Funding for these should be sourced within the town through bonds etc. Concord is looking to build a new library at some point. Should Concord be asking the State of NH for funding or should the City of Concord pay for it entirely? The Audi needed restoration a few years back, a city property. Did the city ask for funding from the state? No., it was funding through donations. That is my understanding of Jim's comments.

Agreed, but when there isn't enough money to go around for every program, priorities must be set. Is it more important that people have food on the table and warm homes, or that these buildings get restored? If you use a family budget as an analogy, it's like paying to get the house painted when there's no food to eat. Some things MUST be funded, and some things are just a bit less vital. When there's extra money, go for it.

Sorry JD but I do not consider myself being selfish or greedy to ask the citizens of Suncook to pay for restoring the historic clock overlooking their Main Street. When there is a pet project in my town I will not ask your town or the people from the state of Oregon to pay for it. I’ll help pay for it with a cash donation or donate time for the project. If you ever wonder why this country is ~~$17 Trillion in debt, one part is all those selfish greedy people that want everyone else to pay for what they want in their town.

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.