White House releases breakdown of sequester’s effects
FILE In this Feb. 19, 2013 file photo President Barack Obama talks about sequestration in the Eisenhower Executive Office building on the White House complex in Washington, accompanied on stage by emergency responders, a group of workers the White House says could be affected if state and local governments lose federal money as a result of budget cuts. Lawmakers and the president on the brink of yet another compromise-or-else deadline Friday, March 1, 2013. (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File)
FILE In this Dec. 13, 2012 file photo House Speaker John Boehner accuses President Barack Obama of not being serious about cutting government spending during a Capitol Hill news conference in Washington. Boehner is insisting that Obama wants far more in tax increases than spending reductions and appears willing to walk the economy "right up to the fiscal cliff." Lawmakers and the president on the brink of yet another compromise-or-else deadline Friday, March 1, 2013. (AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite, File)
The White House yesterday detailed how deep spending cuts set to begin this week would affect programs in every state and the District of Columbia, as President Obama launched a last-ditch effort to pressure congressional Republicans to compromise on a way to stop the across-the-board cuts.
But while Republicans and Democrats were set to introduce dueling legislative proposals this week to avert the Friday start of the spending cuts, known as the sequester, neither side expected the measures to get enough support to pass Congress.
Lawmakers instead were planning for a lengthy round of political jostling ahead of another budget showdown in late March that could determine whether the $85 billion in cuts to domestic and defense spending stick.
Republicans questioned whether the sequester would be as harmful as the White House predicted and worked on a proposal that could preserve the cuts while giving the administration more discretion to choose how to implement them.
Democrats expressed worry that they might be forced to accept the cuts if the public outcry is not loud enough in coming weeks.
Seeking to raise alarm among a public that has not paid much attention to the issue, the White House yesterday released 51 fact sheets describing what would happen over the next seven months if the cuts go into effect.
The Washington area would be hit hard.
Virginia, Maryland and the District of Columbia cumulatively would lose $29 million in elementary and high school funding, putting at risk 390 teacher and teacher-aide jobs and affecting 27,000 students.
About 2,000 poor children would lose access to early education, and less funding would mean 31,400 fewer HIV tests.
And nearly 150,000 civilian Defense Department personnel in the area would be partially furloughed through Sept. 30 – with a total average reduction in pay of $7,500. (Defense Department officials previously explained that the furloughs would probably come in the form of workers being asked to take one day off per week, amounting to a 20 percent cut in pay.)
Obama is planning to go to Newport News, Va., tomorrow to highlight the impact of cuts.
The sequester – worth $1.2 trillion over 10 years – effectively orders the administration to make across-the-board, indiscriminate cuts to agency programs, sparing only some mandatory programs such as Medicaid and food stamps. It is the result of a 2011 deal forged by the White House and Congress to reduce federal borrowing.
It was intended as a draconian measure so blunt that it would force lawmakers to find alternative means of reducing the budget deficit. But while Republicans and Democrats have both made suggestions for how to do so, no plan has gotten enough support to pass Congress.
Yesterday, White House
officials painted an ominous picture of cuts affecting a
wide range of government services if the sequester takes effect – and spotlighted the impact in states that are politically important to Republicans.
Hundreds of teachers could lose their jobs in Ohio, home to House Speaker John Boehner, officials said, and thousands of children might not receive necessary vaccines in conservative Georgia.
Obama’s aides said they would seek to make clear that Republicans are choosing to allow the cuts to go forward instead of agreeing to reduce the deficit by scaling back tax breaks for corporations and the wealthy.
“It’s important to understand why the sequester is going to go into effect,” said Dan Pfeiffer, an Obama senior adviser. “The Republicans are making a policy choice that these cuts are better for the economy than eliminating loopholes that benefit the wealthy.”
“The American people overwhelmingly disagree with that choice,” he added. “But in a constitutional government where Republicans control the House, if they want to force that choice on the American people, they have the right to do that.”
Republicans have rejected the idea of increasing taxes on Americans after more than $600 billion in increases were approved in January.
And yesterday, some accused the administration of exaggerating the danger of allowing the cuts to begin.
Sen. Tom Coburn, a Republican from Oklahoma, said the Obama administration could manage the cuts – only a small fraction of the federal budget – without them interfering too much with people’s lives.
“There are easy ways to cut this money that the American people will never feel,” he said on Fox News Sunday.
Republican congressional aides noted that the House last year passed bills to replace the sequester with other, less-indiscriminate cuts.
“The White House needs to spend less time explaining to the press how bad the sequester will be and more time actually working to stop it,” said Michael Steel, a Boehner spokesman.