M/clear
14°
M/clear
Hi 27° | Lo 18°

Editorial: Time to raise the minimum wage

President Obama has proposed raising the federal minimum wage to $9 per hour and indexing it for inflation. In New Hampshire, lawmakers will consider three bills raising the minimum wage, one to $8 per hour, one to $8.25, and one to $9.25. That last, most generous, proposal would be about 40 cents less per hour than a single person would have to earn to afford food, clothing and shelter in New Hampshire, according to a Massachusetts Institute of Technology study.

Passage of the president’s proposal would render the first two New Hampshire proposals moot. Though at first glance its chances for passage might seem remote, 2014 is an election year, one that will determine whether Republicans keep or lose control of the House of Representatives. Voting against an increase in the minimum wage at a time when the gap between the truly wealthy and everyone else is at robber baron levels might be politically dangerous enough to overcome Republican intransigence. But in case Obama’s proposal doesn’t pass, the Legislature should act to raise the state’s minimum wage.

To be equal in purchasing power to its value in the 1960s, the minimum wage would have to be $9.40 per hour. Despite that, of the three bills before lawmakers, the one calling for the minimum wage to increase by the smallest amount, from $7.25 to $8 per hour, strikes us as the best choice for two reasons. First, as the smallest increase, it has the best chance of passage. Second, the bill calls for indexing the minimum wage for inflation, which would prevent its limited purchasing power from shrinking every year.

We urge New Hampshire’s congressional delegation, including small-business owner Sen. Kelly Ayotte, to support both an increase in the federal minimum wage and the indexing of it for inflation. That would help insulate the minimum wage from a political battle that for decades low-wage workers have usually lost.

The productivity of America’s workforce has never been higher, yet most low- and middle-income wage earners continue to fall behind. A single person who works full-time at the minimum wage doesn’t earn enough to pay for the necessities of an independent life. That’s a disincentive to work in a society that is at its strongest when everyone who can work does.

The tired old warning that increasing the minimum wage will kill jobs has failed to prove true time and time again. Some job losses occur, but the effect is short-lived and minimal because when people at the bottom of the economic ladder get a raise, they spend it. Consider what happens when the minimum wage goes up. The owner of an ice cream stand may have to pay some employees a bit more and be tempted to hire fewer people. But that impact tends to be countered because, thanks to an increase in the minimum wage, more people find that buying an ice cream cone is no longer a treat beyond their reach. Business picks up and, to keep up, the low-wage employer has to hire.

Raising the minimum wage, ideally at the federal level, and indexing it for inflation may not be the most effective way to shrink the income gap and improve the lot of low-wage workers. A combination of higher pay plus tax credits would be more effective, but it’s a long overdue measure that would improve life for millions of people and improve, rather than harm, the economy.

Legacy Comments4

Privatize profits - Socialize costs That's what we do when we allow people to be paid less than a living wage, the citizens ... You and I... subsidize employers with our taxes.

The Monitor Editors may mean well but they are political pundits, marginally skilled as journalists and certainly they have no clue about basic things like, say, "economics". If we raise the minimum wage, all wages that are not $12-$20 will be raised as well by the same margin, causing inflation and therefore means little. Minimum wage jobs are NOT meant to be full time jobs for adults. The Monitor opinion means very little here as it is more founded on feel good naivete than actual economics.

This is just more gutless clap-trap posed as "caring." If the left truly cared about the poor, they would drop restrictions on part-time employment if you are on the dole, make the minimum wage a "living" wage, restrict welfare to one year, mandate that ATM machines not take EBT, embrace a net worth tax in lieu of an income tax and publicly denounce and run tax scofflaws like Kuster, John Kerry and Lizzy Warren out of their party. They will not, however, because they do not care. They just want a political issue on which to gin up votes. $9 an hour - what utter phonies.

too bad that the CM cant afford to hire an economist to teach them real economic theory instead of the CM posting their usual liberal feel good whim of the day

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.