Cloudy
51°
Cloudy
Hi 56° | Lo 36°

Editorial: Students may be collateral damage in budget war

Paying off student loans takes a backseat to other expenses when a college graduate is unemployed or underemployed. Ask any barista with a master’s degree. The high interest rates help explain what can be a double-digit student loan default rate, depending on the type of college. Borrowers recognize that wages are flat, inflation low, the interest rate on their loan high and monthly repayment requirements unaffordable, so they give up. Others decide not to go to college in the first place. That has to change.

Needlessly high student loan interest rates unfairly burden young people starting out in life and sometimes determine their career choices. Recognizing that, in 2007 Congress began lowering the federal student loan interest rate in stages from 6.8 percent to 3.4 percent. But students, and prospective students, are once again in danger of becoming collateral damage in the inane budget war being waged by Republicans inalterably opposed to revenue increases. Unless a budget agreement can be reached, the rate will return to 6.8 percent for new borrowers in July. That would increase student loan costs for New Hampshire students, who already graduate with the highest debt level in the nation, by $30 million; the cost for the nation’s students and their parents would increase by $6 billion. In a nation that needs to make higher education more affordable, not less, that’s madness.

The Republican Party, already perceived of as a bastion of white men who, if they ever needed student loans, paid them off decades ago, will further alienate young voters by raising student loan rates. According to the Congressional Budget Office, the federal government makes a 36-cent profit on every student loan dollar. That figure understates the Treasury’s gain from investing in education. The terrible market for graduates notwithstanding, people who further their education, earn more and thus pay far more over a lifetime in income taxes.

One bill has been filed that would keep the 3.4 percent rate in place for two more years, but borrowers would benefit from the security that comes with an interest rate that’s fixed for the term of the loan. Another bill would let the rate float with inflation. That’s a bad idea. Prospective students who fear that the rate on their loan might balloon with inflation will be far more likely to forgo higher education.

Earlier this week, President Obama proposed a plan to charge market rates for federal student loans. That plan has its good points. It would, for example, require that borrowers pay no more than 10 percent of their discretionary income towards the debt. It would also fix the rate for the life of the loan, which is a good thing if the loan is taken out when rates are low, but a terrible idea if borrowing must be done when rates skyrocket.

The need to educate a populace that has no choice but to compete in a global economy is far too important to be held hostage to the overrated need to reduce the federal deficit. The best way to reduce the deficit in the long run is to make America’s workforce the best educated, most creative and productive in the world. Making higher education more affordable will do that. The student loan rate should be set at a level no higher than that needed to covers costs and losses from defaults that would diminish if rates were lowered.

We congratulate Sen. Jeanne Shaheen on her humane Pay as You Earn proposal, which would cap student loan repayments at 10 percent of a borrower’s discretionary income. It could cut the default rate and move some graduates into careers that they might not have pursued, given the need to make big loan payments. It would help convince people that pursuing higher education is a gamble worth taking, one that doesn’t require living in your parents’ basement while your loan is repaid.

Anyone who has borrowed for higher education, or may need to, should keep a close eye on their representatives in Congress and be sure to register to vote.

Legacy Comments8

Jim..I'm pretty sure thats crony capitalism.

From 2007-2012 Federal Student Loan Balances jumped by 97%. Private Loan Balances jumped 4%. During that same time period deliquency rates for federal Loans rose by 27%. Delinquency rates for private loans rose 2%. It seems that many prefer the federal loans, and have no problem defaulting on them. After all, it is the govt, and we know they allow folks to abuse most of their programs, where the private sector goes after money owed. This federal Loan situation will be another bubble like the housing market.

Always interesting that young people can afford to buy cars and houses but they cannot afford to pay back the loan that allowed them to buy more. UNH avg. debt ~~$25K to repay over 10 years but they can pay a higher priced car loan off in 5 years. NH was giving $100million and the schools could not spend it fast enough. Make the schools lower the costs, the student debt would be lower and more students could attend. Six figure salaries for 9 months work???

Yadda yadda yadda...the Republicans, budget war, held hostage...etc..same old same old. It took democrats over 4 years to pass a budget, and what do they come up with? More spending, more debt. But what the Monitor just said and what I just said makes peoples eyes glaze over. Its enough already. When I went to school in the 80's, a 2 year associates degree tuition was $900. What is it now, why is it that much, should it be that much, what can we do to lower the cost should be topics for discussion. Also, for so called "educated" persons to state the need to reduce the federal deficit is "overrated" I suggest you might look at the facts. Add up all federal, state and local deficits and each one of us now owes over $200k.

Big Government shut down private industry participation in the Student loan business - courtesy of the 100% democrat legislation called Obamacare

Taking over the system from banks was appropriate. Banks were making huge profits off the system. Going forward, the gov't will make a mess of it so who knows what will work best.

There is a name for the form of Government that takes over an entire industry and it ends in "ISM" and that is where democrats and Obama want to take you.

And of course "capitalISM" is where the government takes taxes from you (under penalty of law) and gives it to the banks so "only" the bank makes money. You pay with tax dollars for the government program and then you pay more for the product so the bank gets to make a larger profit. Hmmmm...

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.