Hi 35° | Lo 21°

My Turn: A rising standard of treatment toward animals

As our collective consciousness about the treatment of women, African-Americans and gays and lesbians has expanded over the past few decades, our ethical standards have been raised and gradually reflected in our laws. The same can be said for nonhuman animals.

As we further question our relationship to animals, and as ethologists uncover more about the feelings, intelligence and complex communication of various species, our society’s standards of treatment have risen. Euthanizing cats and dogs in gas chambers was once considered the norm; today gas chambers have been banned in 19 states. And while there was a time when the majority of Americans agreed that industries such as puppy mills and factory farms were legitimate means for conducting business, the commodification of nonhuman animals is being questioned more and more.

Harvard University is shutting down its primate research center, and New Hampshire has joined 37 other states in banning dog racing. But the laws protecting farmed animals lag far behind the standards we set for other animals.

Given the scale in which they are slaughtered (10 billion land animals in the United States annually) and the fact that they’re consumed by the vast majority of Americans, we tend to view farmed animals through a more distant lens.

Some farmed animal practices that would be deemed cruel if done to cats or dogs are accepted as “standard practice” in animal agriculture and are judged to be legal. Recall the case of hundreds of baby chicks arriving dead at the Keene post office a couple years ago, apparently frozen to death. Since male baby chicks are useless in the egg industry and inferior in meat quality, they are often used as packing material to provide warmth for female chicks in shipping. Other standard practices are to either throw newborn male chicks in garbage bags where they suffocate, or feed them to a chipper where they are ground up alive. Similarly, male calves are useless in the dairy industry and are often dragged away from their mothers within 24-48 hours of birth, with umbilical cords attached and still wet and glistening from birth.

Many of us in New Hampshire live in rural areas with farmers for neighbors and have seen baby calves tied to small, plastic crates. Baby animals that would normally follow their mothers around a field or kick and frolic with their spirited new life are instead isolated on very short tethers for a few short months until slaughter. Pigs are routinely castrated without anesthetic, and runts of the litter are often killed by “thumping” or having their bodies slammed against walls and floors. And since there are no enforced federal regulations on farmed animal transportation, animals in transit can be severely crowded, exposed during heat waves and sub-zero temperatures, and travel great distances without food or water. The U.S. Department of Agriculture estimates that 120,000 cattle and 82,000 pigs die annually just in transport.

Had we known these animals as individuals, and were witness to their suffering, perhaps public outcry would result in prohibition of the most egregious practices. But animal industries and even small farms tend to hide truths that may disturb consumers. Do owners of backyard egg-laying hens ever wonder what happened to the male chicks? Do dairy consumers ever question why cows lactate, or for whom their milk was intended? Even legal practices are stomach-churning, and yet the only groups that seem genuinely concerned over the deliberate, cruel and illegal treatment of farmed animals are animal protection groups.

The New Hampshire Legislature will be voting on the “ag-gag” bill in a couple months, and you’ll be hearing confusing and contradicting information. The Center for Consumer Freedom supports the bill, as its corporate supporters and donors have paid it to do. But the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union and the Humane Society of the United States oppose the bill. Enough said. Don’t be fooled by the upcoming sleight of hand. Please ask your legislators to vote against the ag-gag bill.

(Louisa Dell’Amico lives in Northfield.)

Legacy Comments6

Around 1978 or 79, my husband and I thought we might be interested in owning a veal farm. We were naïve (as I think most people were then) about treatment of animals for food. We went to see a veal farm in Raymond. We had no idea. He had grown up on a small farm on LI and we thought we know a little. We saw these poor animals tied into their stalls never allowed out, to move a muscle. Also they were fed some horrible pink stuff, not even animal feed. Two had died in the stalls and had to be removed quickly. The owner said that was part of the expense, disposal of sick animals. They were so weak, they couldn't even moo. I can't say I became a vegetarian then, but I became aware of animal cruelty. That was 30 years ago, it is so much worse now. I know humans will always eat meat, but I believe anyone who believes in a merciful God, would believe He put these animals on earth to suffer like that. Just like a sick dog or cat looks into a human's eyes for help, it is impossible to turn away. I feel we will be judged on how we treat the lesser beings on the earth.

As a carnivore myself, I was unaware of these illegal practices and find them absolutely horrific. How come I have never heard about this treatment before? I don't appreciate being kept in the dark on important issues that involve the treatment of animals. Thank you to the author for informing and enlightening me. I can't say I am going to give up eating meat overnight but it has definitely effected the way I feel about the food on my plate prior to having read this. Who knows, maybe I am a vegan in the making.

Bravo! on an excellent column, concise and very well written. Thank you, Louise. I hope others will join me in asking our legislators to vote against this bill.

The venison in my freezer comes from an animal that lived in the wild as nature intended and was not treated inhumanely at any point during its life. 'Nuff said.

Except that this letter had nothing to do with hunting. I respect the philosphy of clean kill hunting, don't get me wrong. The venison is guiltless, but what about the rest of the protein and dairy that you consume? I write this as a carnivore myself, with deeply conflicted feelings about the fact that I continue to buy "factory meat." Even if I could afford to eat only humanely raised meat, it still would not change the fact that big ag exists. The only answer I can think of is greater regulation or at least better monitoring of that industry.

I've found an answer to the question of guilt surrounding "factory meat." I don't eat "factory meat." I purchase locally sourced protein from local farms if there's no venison to be had. There are plenty of options - especially in rural states like NH - for people who choose not to support "BIG MEAT." And the irony is that "BIG CORN", "BIG VEGGIE" and "BIG TOFU" are just as harmful to animals. There's a lot of killing that goes on at the hands of these industries. Read Tovar Cerulli's book "Mindful Carnivore."

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.