Some clouds
33°
Some clouds
Hi 59° | Lo 34°

GOP candidates retreat on full Obamacare repeal

They now suggest keeping elements

Republican candidates have begun to retreat in recent weeks from their all-out assault on the Affordable Care Act in favor of a more piecemeal approach, suggesting they would preserve some aspects of the law while jettisoning others.

The changing tactics signal that the health care law – while still unpopular with voters overall – may no longer be the lone rallying cry for Republicans seeking to defeat Democrats in this year’s midterm elections.

The moves also come as senior House Republicans have decided to postpone a floor vote on their own health reform proposal – making it less likely that a GOP alternative will be offered before the November elections, according to lawmakers familiar with the deliberations. The delay will give them more time to work on the bill and weigh the consequences of putting a detailed policy before the voters in the fall, lawmakers said.

On the campaign trail, some Republicans and their outside allies have started talking about the health care law in more nuanced terms than they have in the past.

The U.S. Chamber of Commerce is running ads suggesting that many of its favored candidates will tweak the ACA rather than scrap it. One spot says Rep. Joseph Heck, a Nevada Republican, will fix the law; another says Republican Massachusetts House contender Richard Tisei will “work in a bipartisan manner to fix healthcare the right way.”

The business group’s ads in Kentucky use almost identical language, declaring in separate spots that Republicans Sen. Mitch McConnell and Rep. Andy Barr would work to “fix” the “Obamacare mess.”

In Oregon, GOP Senate candidate and pediatric neurosurgeon Monica Wehby backs the ban on discriminating against consumers on the basis of pre-existing conditions and the provision allowing parents to keep their children on their plans up until age 26, according to spokesman Charlie Pearce. While she opposes other aspects of the law and would like to replace it, Pearce said, she does not see that as realistic while “the president’s in office.”

Michigan GOP Senate candidate Terri Lynn Land has called for ACA repeal. But yesterday, Land spokeswoman Heather Swift said the candidate applauds a move by Gov. Rick Snyder to expand Medicaid coverage under the law.

Some Republicans are grappling with how to characterize their views. Former Massachusetts senator Scott Brown, who is running for a Senate seat in New Hampshire, continues to campaign against it. But Brown also acknowledges keeping his 23-year old daughter on his insurance plan – which would not be offered without the health-care law – and has declined to say whether he would endorse expansion of the Medicaid program in the state.

Will Hurd, a GOP House candidate running against Rep. Pete Gallego, a Texas Democrat, in the state’s only competitive congressional race, said this week in an interview that there are two “simple things” he would fix about the law. He would provide tax credits to individuals seeking care and allow people to buy plans being sold in other states.

In Minnesota, Republican House candidate Stewart Mills pledges in a campaign ad to “replace” the law, rather than simply repealing it.

Elizabeth Wilner, a senior vice president at Kantar Media, wrote in a recent column for the Cook Political Report that, after more than $400 million worth of anti-Obamacare ads in recent months, “a shift already is underway” on the airwaves.

The health law - which had a rocky rollout in the fall - exceeded its enrollment goals last month, but has continued to struggle to gain traction with voters. A Gallup poll released Thursday found 51 percent of Americans disapprove of the ACA while 43 percent approve. But surveys consistently find fewer than four in 10 want to repeal the law, while about six in 10 prefer making changes or improvements in the current framework.

“The sentiment toward the Affordable Care Act is still strongly negative, but people are saying, ‘Don’t throw the baby out” with the bathwater, said Glen Bolger, a partner with the GOP polling firm Public Opinion Strategies.

Democrats such as Rep. Steve Israel of New York, who chairs the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, said the latest shifts show that the GOP plan to repeatedly attack the ACA has “backfired.”

“Now they’re promising fixes but won’t be specific,” Israel said in a statement. “That’s like a car dealer offering you a trade-in without telling you the car you’re getting in return.”

McConnell, who has vowed to rip up Obamacare by “root and branch,” is under fire for saying his opposition to the law is “unconnected” to the fate of his state’s health insurance exchange, Kynect, suggesting the state could keep the system without the ACA.

Unlike the federal exchange, Kentucky’s system worked smoothly from the beginning, with nearly 82,000 residents signing up for private insurance and 331,000 deemed eligible for Medicaid coverage. Kynect received $252 million in federal grants under the law, according to state officials, while the Medicaid expansion stemmed from a mandate that the program cover Americans living at 138 percent of the federal poverty line.

The campaign manager for McConnell’s Democratic opponent, Alison Lundergan Grimes, issued a statement this week saying, “McConnell has voted to destroy Kynect - and he has said he will do it again.” Grimes will “fix the law,” the statement said.

In Washington, several chairmen of House committees told GOP leaders at a meeting last week that they would prefer to wait until next year to vote on a comprehensive health-care alternative, according to Republicans who spoke on the condition of anonymity to discuss internal deliberations.

House Majority Leader Eric Cantor, a Virginia Republican, said deliberations will continue and a vote on a GOP plan remains a priority. Many GOP lawmakers are unsure whether the party should unveil their plans now or wait for a possible Senate takeover.

House Republicans had initially planned to test different health-care messages during the spring recess.

“The wave of the election is already within sight, and I believe we are going to do well,” said House Chief Deputy Whip Peter Roskam, an Illinois Republican. “I don’t think we need a replacement bill to win the election, but it is something that would be helpful in guiding our governing agenda for next year.”

A significant number of GOP Senate and House aspirants still back the idea of fully repealing the ACA, including Senate candidates Tom Cotton of Arkansas and Thom Tillis of North Carolina.

Only a handful of ads on behalf of Democratic congressional candidates attack Republicans for wanting to abolish the law. Minnesota Democrat Mike Obermueller has a commercial showing the dance party that would break out among insurers if his opponent, GOP Rep. John Kline, were able to reverse it.

Most Democratic Senate incumbents have been more cautious, although they all say they stand by the law they voted for 4½ years ago. Only Sen. Brian Schatz of Hawaii has run an ad touting his support for it, and Grimes made a point of saying last week, “If I had been in the Senate, it would have been a different law.”

Jahan Wilcox, spokesman for the Republican National Committee, wrote in an email to reporters that Democrats will soon discover that the law remains a serious political liability.

“We are thrilled Democrats are set to embrace their job-killing healthcare law,” Wilcox wrote.

Legacy Comments6

Jim and gracchus, Obamacare was one of those "secret plans". Pelosi said: "We need to pass the bill so that people can find out what is in it".

What Pelosi actually said: "People won't appreciate reform until it passes." You should stop lying about this. It's unbecoming. http://www.mediaite.com/tv/the-context-behind-nancy-pelosis-famous-we-have-to-pass-the-bill-quote/

I mispoke. What Pelosi MEANT: People won't appreciate reform until it passes. What she said: "“we have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it, away from the fog of the controversy.”

I think you are wrong on both counts....what she meant was....the senate had not given the house anything to vote on yet.

""GOP lawmakers are unsure whether the party should unveil their plans now or wait for a possible Senate takeover"". I don't get this, if you have a plan aren't you supposed to run on that plan if you feel it is the best plan. Why does the GOP not want the public to know what their "real" intensions are. The only reason to "hide" the plan is if you don't think the majority of voters would support it. Sounds like this whole "fix it" is just a cover up to get votes and then come out later with the real plan.

Remember Nixon in 1968 campaigning on his "secret plan" to end the Viet Nam war? As it turned out the secret plan was 7 more years of war which, if I recall correctly, didn't end all that well for our side. There is no reason to believe that this incarnation of the secret plan will be any better.

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.