Shooting suspect: ‘Illegal war’ provoked Fort Hood rampage
In this court room sketch, Judge Col. Tara Osborn, top, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, right, and defense attorney, Lt. Col. Kris Poppe, left, are shown, Wednesday, Aug. 21, 2013, in Fort Hood, Texas. Hasan rested his case Wednesday without calling any witnesses or testifying in his own defense. Hasan is accused of killing 13 people and wounding more than 30 others at the Texas military base in November 2009. (AP Photo/Brigitte Woosley)
American soldiers deploying overseas to “engage in an illegal war” provoked the deadly shooting rampage at Fort Hood, Texas, in 2009, the soldier accused in the attack said yesterday after refusing to mount a defense during his trial.
Maj. Nidal Hasan could face the death penalty if convicted for the attack that killed 13 people and wounded more than 30 others at the Texas military base. But when given the chance to rebut prosecutors’ lengthy case – which included nearly 90 witnesses and hundreds of pieces of evidence – the Army psychiatrist declined.
About five minutes after court began yesterday, a day after prosecutors rested their case, the judge asked Hasan how he wanted to proceed. Hasan, who is acting as his own attorney, said: “The defense rests.”
But after jurors were dismissed, Hasan told the judge, Col. Tara Osborn, that the jury shouldn’t have the option of convicting him on the lesser charge of voluntary manslaughter.
“I would like to agree with the prosecution that it wasn’t done under the heat of sudden passion,” Hasan said. “There was adequate provocation – that these were deploying soldiers that were going to engage in an illegal war.”
Prosecutors had no
“There’s not a shred of evidence to suggest the accused was acting under a heat of passion as he was committing the single largest mass murder on a U.S. military installation ever,” Col. Steve Henricks, one of the prosecutors, told the judge.
The exchange came during a late-afternoon hearing, hours after Osborn adjourned jurors for the day. Closing arguments are scheduled to begin today in the court-martial, the military’s equivalent of a trial, though it’s unclear whether Hasan plans to say anything.
So far, he has made no attempt to prove his innocence. He has questioned just three witnesses, and the only piece of evidence he submitted was a favorable evaluation he received from a former supervisor a few days before the attack.
So his simple declaration yesterday abdicating a
defense wasn’t much of a
“I think it’s consistent with everything he’s done,” said Geoffrey Corn, a South Texas College of Law professor.