Hi 16° | Lo -9°

Concord City Council passes ordinance forbidding motorists, pedestrians to exchange items

Panhandling is no longer permitted along roads and intersections in Concord.

But the ordinance passed unanimously by the city council last night does not contain the words panhandling or solicitation. It prevents anyone from exchanging items with people in cars that are in the roadway.

Police Chief John Duval said he is concerned with public safety. It’s dangerous for motorists and pedestrians when cars stop to give money to panhandlers, he said.

“We’re trying to stop that behavior going on in our roadways,” said City Solicitor Jim Kennedy.

The violation-level offense carries a maximum fine of $500. Motorists could not be found in violation of the ordinance, Kennedy said; only the person standing outside the car would be fined.

The council first considered ordinances to limit panhandling in February.

A first draft would have banned “aggressive panhandling” – touching, following or intimidating people to solicit money – as well as soliciting money from people in cars, at bus stops and near banks. That ordinance would have made violations a misdemeanor-level offense, with a sentence of up to 90 days in jail by the third offense.

After that proposal drew opposition from homeless advocates, the city’s legal department presented a compromise: A second version of the ordinance would have banned anyone from soliciting money in intersections and along roadways. But that ordinance also drew concern at the February city council meeting, where several people testified about its limits on First Amendment rights.

The city council asked Kennedy and Duval to work with the concerned advocates and return with another proposal.

Devon Chaffee, executive director of the New Hampshire Civil Liberties Union, thanked city officials last night for “really comprehending especially the constitutional issues that were at stake and taking the time to think those through.”

Chaffee spoke before the council in February and warned that the other two ordinances would limit free speech.

The ordinance approved last night does not regulate types of speech, Kennedy said. It would ban panhandling, but also lemonade stands and events such as firefighters’ fundraisers. It does have exceptions for police officers performing official duties and emergency situations.

“Of course we will be watching . . . to see how it’s implemented,” Chaffee said. “Of course we do have some concerns with the $500 maximum fine.”

Kennedy said judges would base fines on a person’s ability to pay.

Kevin Curdie, a Concord resident, said he supported the ordinance. But he remains concerned about aggressive panhandling, especially after hearing so many people testify at public hearings about the rights of panhandlers.

“I just wonder why nobody really seems to be interested in my right or anybody else who’s traveling in downtown not to be infringed upon,” Curdie said. “I’d like to walk the streets without being, as I call it, harassed.”

Councilor Keith Nyhan said he shares the same concerns.

“This is a first step but not a final step,” he said. “There’s more to be done in curbing what I consider to be aggressive panhandling.”

Councilor Fred Keach said he supported the ordinance, but it does not address his broader concerns about panhandling and homelessness.

“There are some underlying problems in terms of mental health (and) substance abuse that’s the real issue,” Keach said.

(Laura McCrystal can be reached at 369-3312 or or on Twitter @lmccrystal.)


Concord City Council votes to authorize property assessments for 2013

Monday, May 13, 2013

The Concord City Council last night voted to authorize property assessments for 2013. Last night’s vote does not affect 2012 property assessments. The overall value of commercial properties increased 13.77 percent last year. Many commercial property owners have expressed frustration with that increase, and the city received 350 tax abatement applications, including about 300 from commercial property owners. “You know, …

Legacy Comments8

For all to see......this is the democrat solution to homelessness....everybody should be ashamed to call them self democrats

Rabbit !!!! You get the coveted "Woof!" !!!!! I for one always give a homeless person a snack or soda from my lunch box. This will quickly be ruled UN-Constitutional. And RIGHTLY SO ! ~Driver & Duke

So, say your spouse is bringing the kids to a doctor appointment. While they are backing out of the driveway, you see the lab slips, or vaccination form, etc., they are supposed to bring, forgotten on the counter. You run out the door, yelling "wait!" and waving the paperwork. Your spouse stops in the street while you hand the papers to them.....$500 fine? For this?

gdn 1, yes, and while I'm waiting at a traffic light, someone could come up to my car and hand me a winning Power Ball ticket.

Thank goodness this issue has been taken care of. For years I have been harassed by kids trying to sell me lemonade, girl scouts pushing their cookies on me, and those sport teams that insist on car washes to raise money for new uniforms, etc. Who do they think they are! Once a year I have to deal with these groups. I think we should also look at other areas where we are harassed. I have kids in my neighborhood who roller skate, ride bicycles and make a lot of noise laughing while they do it. Maybe we could outlaw those things also. They should just stay indoors, eat junk food and play video games. So it is okay to ban the groups that do their bidding once a year, after all they are in the same catagory as panhandlers right! Mayor Bloomberg would be proud!

RabbitNH, Great post. The only thing this ordinance will do, is push the bums on the sidewalks, to bother pedestrians. This will be great to help bring people to downtown Concord, for a great shopping experience.

Thanks Waltham, I also read an article about Berkley CA had to outlaw benches on their Main Street downtown area, because the homeless were using them for panhandling, sleeping etc. As a result, the local business has found that many elderly folks do not want to shop as they used the benches to take rests while shopping. What a crazy world we live in. Common sense is hard to find these days.

Interesting that the “”Motorists could not be found in violation of the ordinance””. From a safety standpoint the person on the curb is not actually stopping the traffic, the person driving the car is. Two people engaged in the same offense and only one (I guess the non-voter) is actually doing anything wrong. Hopefully Jerry Gappens from NH Motor Speedway will be giving out free tickets to the races in Concord like I saw on the news, he can afford the whole $500 fine.

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.