Cloudy
54°
Cloudy
Hi 66° | Lo 42°

Obama announces change to address health insurance cancellations

President Obama relented yesterday to pressure from the public and his own party and changed one of the bedrock requirements of the new health care law to fulfill his promise to allow people to keep their insurance plans if they want.

While the move was aimed at solving a problem that was threatening the president’s credibility and public faith in the law, it raised a slew of new questions, including whether insurers would adjust, whether millions of customers would pay higher premiums and whether states would make it available.

In New Hampshire, it was unclear how the state would be affected as officials at insurance department are still evaluating the change and expect to know more today.

About 22,000 New Hampshire residents have been notified that their individual health insurance plans are being discontinued by Anthem Blue Cross Blue Shield of New Hampshire, but even before Obama’s announcement, they had the option of keeping their benefits for another year if they renew by today.

The president made the change at a White House news conference that quickly turned from a specific policy announcement into a nearly hourlong deconstruction of broader flaws with the health care law and Obama’s responsibility for its early failures.

The president was contrite and his admissions were many – he conceded that he was left in the dark about aspects of the crowning achievement of his presidency; he acknowledged that he and his advisers underestimated how hard it would be to sell insurance over a website; he could not guarantee that the website would work well for everyone by the end of the month; he allowed that federal government rules were an impediment; and he lamented the political problems he caused for members of his own party.

“There have been times where I thought we were . . . slapped around a little bit unjustly. This one’s deserved, all right? It’s on us,” Obama said regarding the policy cancellation issue, which contradicted his repeated promises that people would be able to keep insurance plans they liked.

Obama said insurance companies could continue for another year to offer health plans sold to individuals and small businesses that do not meet requirements under the new law that set minimum standards for the benefits that policies must cover.

Individual policies have long been a problematic part of the insurance market, with higher prices than most group plans, lower benefits and a tendency to cut off people when they get sick. The health care law tried to address this problem by directing Americans who rely on individual policies to buy coverage through the new insurance marketplaces – and by defining the set of essential benefits.

Under the new rules, people may renew individual and small-group policies, which otherwise would have ended at New Year’s, until Oct. 1 – allowing them to stay in effect through September 2015. Obama said the administration will insist that insurance companies that continue to sell policies that do not comply with the new law inform consumers about “what protections these renewed plans don’t include” and alert customers to potentially better and more affordable insurance in the new federal and state marketplaces.

The president’s remarks came as a number of recent polls illuminated the escalating problems that Obama and Democrats face. A new Gallup poll released yesterday shows disapproval of the Affordable Care Act has risen from 47 percent just a couple of weeks ago to a high of 55 percent. At the same time, Obama’s approval ratings have dropped, hovering between the high 30s and low 40s.

The new proposal appeared to strengthen the president’s position with Democratic lawmakers, including those in the House who will vote today on a Republican bill that would let people keep their existing policies for a year and also allow new customers to buy them even though they don’t conform to the new law.

“For now, the president’s actions are sufficient,” Maryland Rep. Elijah Cummings, the top Democrat on the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, told reporters after a nearly 90-minute briefing with White House Chief of Staff Denis McDonough.

Not all House Democrats were convinced. Rep. Kyrsten Sinema of Arizona said the plan was “a start,” but she said she will vote for the Republican proposal.

In his news conference, Obama described the Oct. 1 launch of the federal health insurance marketplace as “rough” and cautioned that the online enrollment system that has been plagued by glitches may not be fully fixed by the end of the month, as his aides had been predicting for nearly three weeks.

Obama described both the cancellations on the individual market and the website rollout as “two fumbles . . . on a big game – but the game’s not over,” he said. He vowed that the nation would not return to what he called the broken health care system that existed before the Affordable Care Act.

For some, the president’s announcement raised more questions. Deborah Persico, a 58-year-old District of Columbia lawyer who represents indigent criminal defendants, received a letter that her plan was going to be canceled in October 2014. She’s not sure whether the president’s “fix” will mean her plan will be extended through January 2015, and in any event, she would still have to shop on the city’s new health insurance exchange, where a comparable plan comes with a higher premium, higher deductible and higher out-of-pocket cost.

“It’s just a temporary delay of the inevitable. You’re still going to lose your policy,” she said. “A fix would have been ‘If you like your policy you can keep your policy, period.’ This is just ‘If you like your policy, you can keep your policy for a year.’ ”

Though the president announced the change, the White House is allowing each state to determine whether its residents may keep noncompliant health plans. State insurance commissioners and other health policy experts made clear the landscape is going to vary substantially around the country.

Eight states, including California and New York, have recently forbidden insurance companies from continuing to sell individual or small-group health plans unless they meet the new federal standards for coverage.

Within hours of the president’s announcement, Washington’s insurance commissioner issued a defiant statement that criticized the president and said the state would not allow noncompliant policies to be extended beyond the end of the year.

“I do not believe his proposal is a good deal for the state of Washington,” the insurance commissioner, Mike Kreidler, said, adding that substandard health plans need to end in order to protect consumers and prevent prices from rising.

Arkansas’s insurance commissioner, Jay Bradford, said he would not permit the extension: “It would be more chaos added to an already chaotic situation.”

In the Washington, D.C., region, CareFirst, the area’s dominant carrier, said it was studying Obama’s announcement and would communicate directly with affected policyholders. But CareFirst noted that it was “strictly bound” by state laws. “At the moment, it is unclear whether state laws would preclude us from doing what the president has proposed,” CareFirst said.

In Maryland, for example, state law requires that beginning in 2014, new plans in the individual and small-group market meet the provisions of the Affordable Care Act, including coverage of essential health benefits, such as maternity care.

Officials in Florida and Kentucky said they would heed the president’s call to grant extensions.

Insurers said yesterday that while they appreciated Obama’s effort to address consumer concerns, they remained worried that the move could distort the risk pool in the new state and federal health insurance marketplaces. That’s because individual policies tend to be significantly more expensive than group insurance, except for customers who are young, healthy and use little medical care – the very people that federal officials are counting on to join the new exchanges.

“Changing the rules after health plans have already met the requirements of the law could destabilize the market and result in higher premiums for consumers,” said Karen Ignani, president and chief executive of America’s Health Insurance Plans. “If now fewer younger and healthier people choose to purchase coverage in the exchange, premiums will increase and there will be fewer choices for consumers.”

The American Academy of Actuaries was among the groups that immediately warned of negative effects. The White House’s approach is “threatening the viability” of the new insurance marketplaces, said Corri Uccello, the academy’s senior health fellow.

Even if their mix of customers changes as a result of the new rules, insurers cannot change their prices for 2014, because the rates already have been set by each state’s insurance regulators. Senior administration officials said they could not predict what might happen to prices for 2015, when some old individual and small-business policies will still be in effect for much of the year.

(The Associated press contributed to this report.)

Legacy Comments7

Had the ACA website been up to snuff, those whose policies were being cancelled because they didn't meet the new ACA requirements would likely have found better policies at the same or cheaper prices on the site. Eventually, the glitches will be fixed, and the reforms of the ACA will be seen for what they are--tinkering at the margin that has brought more people into the risk pool--which should by itself lower costs slightly. But the only real "fix" to a healthcare system that costs more than those of other advanced nations, yet produces poorer outcomes, is some form of a single payer/universal coverage plan. As in many of these countries, people would be free to buy better coverage on top of whatever a universal plan provided. But a basic plan with no deductible, and with no exclusions for preexisting conditions, is a mark of a civilized society, and fulfills the promise embedded in the Declaration and Constitution regarding "the pursuit of happiness" and "the general welfare" . Adequate healthcare is a basic human right--good health is a prerequisite of that pursuit, and should not depend on the accident of one's birth or chance misfortune. http://www.slate.com/blogs/business_insider/2013/11/10/national_health_insurance_britain_s_system_is_great.html

Well, I will go with health experts, including many renowned physicians and specialists. The fact is that the policies are not less expensive nor are the deductibles acceptable. I think any system which has 85% of the people happy with the process and their care is pretty darned good. Your better outcome statistics is a canard. Moreover you grossly misinterpret the Constitution. The "pursuit of happiness" is not a guarantee, it allows the citizenry the freedom to pursue that happiness. The "general welfare" clause is used by progressives to over interpret rights and expand them. This is a land of opportunity, not guarantees. Everyone has a right to the freedom to pursue opportunities but there are not and can not be guaranteed outcomes. Although I might agree with we need to help that 15% of the population that can't afford care, we don't need to ruin the "happiness" of the other 85%. Single payer puts everyone in the same situation. Obamacare is partial payer and it is failing, single payer would be worse. Beyond that, freedom of choice is an important freedom and dictating to others that they have to give up something they have earned and perfectly happy with is not a civilized society, it is despotism. Single payer equates to "From those accoding to their ability; to those according to their need" and we all know what that means.

Again Bruce incorrectly cites the "General Welfare Clause" to push his socialism. Any reading of Madison, Hamilton, Jefferson and the Federalist Papers destroys the 5th grade public school history teachers flawed understanding of the clause. 2) Basic Human rights are given by God and it is only the governments role to protect those rights not to grant them.

Shock poll: Fox trusted more than Obama on Obamacare info Washington Examiner......The most trusted voice in America on Obamacare isn´t the president -- or most of the media, Congress or insurance companies. It´s Fox News Channel. Just 11 percent said that President Obama is the most trusted source of Obamacare information. The usual liberal Carp Per Diem are akin the orchestra continuing to play as the Titanic sinks and will post the failed liberal socialism line until they die

Finally the Concord Monitor reports Obama's record low poll numbers. Finally the Concord Monitor reports the number of New Hampshire citizens losing their insurance (22,000) because of ObamaKare. Perhaps the Monitor could inform the public what branch of government Obama is in? He is in the executive branch which means that he enforces law or in a lot of cases he doesn't enforce law. Obama can't make law, period. This means that he can fail to enforce his own law but he can not force insurance companies to break the law. We all know Obama wanted to transform America bet we don't need a dictator. We really need to fire Shaheen, Shea-Porter, and Kuster to protect America from Obama.

what a complete mess....

Yes only 269 NH citizens signed up for ObamaKare. In the last 2 months I have heard at least 269 ObamaKare Ads on the radio so that means that less than 1 person per Radio Ad have signed up for ObamaKare. People know ObamaKare is a very bad deal.

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.