Cloudy
50°
Cloudy
Hi 53° | Lo 35°

Russian forces expand control of Crimea

Ukrainian seamen stand guard on the Ukrainian navy ship Slavutich at harbor of  Sevastopol, Ukraine, Monday, March 3, 2014. The Ukrainian Defense Ministry said that Russian forces that have overtaken Ukraine's strategic region of Crimea are demanding that the ship's crew surrender.  (AP Photo/Andrew Lubimov)

Ukrainian seamen stand guard on the Ukrainian navy ship Slavutich at harbor of Sevastopol, Ukraine, Monday, March 3, 2014. The Ukrainian Defense Ministry said that Russian forces that have overtaken Ukraine's strategic region of Crimea are demanding that the ship's crew surrender. (AP Photo/Andrew Lubimov)

The embattled government in Kiev said last night that Russian forces had dramatically escalated the standoff between the two nations by giving Ukraine’s army and navy in Crimea a blunt ultimatum: pledge allegiance to the region’s new pro-Russia leadership by morning or be forced by Russia to submit.

A spokesman for the Russian Black Sea Fleet, which is berthed in the Crimean port of Sevastopol, denied that a threat had been made, and the Russian Defense Ministry called the accusation “utter nonsense.” But as Russian troops and warships surrounded Ukrainian security installations throughout the autonomous Crimean Peninsula, it was clear that Ukraianian forces believed they faced an imminent threat even though no shot had been fired.

A Ukrainian Defense Ministry official alleged that Russia’s Black Sea Fleet commander had set a deadline of 10 p.m. yesterday, Eastern time, for Ukrainian forces to capitulate, according to the Interfax-Ukrainian news agency.

The stepped-up Russian troop movements came two days after the Russian parliament approved the use of force to protect the country’s citizens and military sites in Crimea, a region with deep ties to Russia. The actions yesterday triggered a cascade of condemnation from European and American officials, who vowed that Russia would face consequences if it did not pull its soldiers back.

President Obama said that Moscow was “on the wrong side of history,” and threatened “a whole series of steps – economics, diplomatic” to isolate Russia and “have a negative impact on its economy and its standing in the world.”

In the deep-water harbor at Sevastopol, a Ukrainian naval command ship was confronted last night by four tugboats flying Russian colors and boxed in by a Russian minesweeper. Other Russian warships appeared at the mouth of the harbor to block an escape to the sea. A nearby Ukrainian naval station flew a Russian flag.

As the anxious wives of officers on the Ukrainian ship watched from shore, its crew rushed about in what appeared to be an attempt to repel boarders. The sailors – who carried sidearms and military assault rifles – fixed mattresses to the railings, uncoiled fire hoses and brought firefighting equipment on deck.

Last night, the Russian Black Sea Fleet ordered the crew members to lay down their arms and leave the ships, according to the UNIAN news agency, quoting a Ukrainian military source.

Ukrainian officials expressed fears that the tensions could lead to violence overnight, which could give Russia reason to justify military action.

“Provocations with killing of three to four Russian soldiers are planned on the territory of Crimea tonight,” said Deputy Interior Minister Mykola Velichkovych, the ministry’s press service reported. Speaking to the Russians, Velichkovych said, “We call on you to come to your senses. We call on you to stop.”

Ukraine’s acting president, Oleksandr Turchinov, said yesterday that he had been in communication with Ukraine’s military commanders in Crimea, and they assured him that they would not yield to the Russians, according to the UNN news agency of Ukraine.

Western diplomats pressed for Russia to pull back. In an interview with the BBC, British Foreign Secretary William Hague, who was in Kiev, said that the Russian intervention in Crimea has produced “a very tense and dangerous situation” that amounted to Europe’s “biggest crisis” so far in the 21st century.

“The world cannot just allow this to happen,” said Hague, whose American counterpart, Secretary of State John Kerry, was due in Kiev today.

French Foreign Minister Laurent Fabius said the European Union would have an emergency summit Thursday and take action against Russia if it has not sent troops back to their barracks in the Crimea by then.

But the Western threats appeared to have made little impact on Russia by last night. Speaking in Geneva, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov justified the Russian troop deployment as necessary to protect Russians living in Crimea “until the normalization of the political situation” in Ukraine, where months of protests led to the ouster of pro-Russian President Viktor Yanukovych more than two weeks ago.

Russian forces, already in control of much of Crimea, took possession of a ferry terminal in Kerch, in the eastern part of the peninsula just across a strait from Russian territory, according to reports from the area. The terminal serves as a departure point for many ships heading to Russia and could be used to send even more Russian troops into Crimea.

Ukrainian news media reported that a representative of Russia’s Black Sea Fleet also called on members of Ukrainian Aviation Brigade at an air base in Belbek to denounce Ukrainian government authority and swear allegiance to the new Crimean government. By nightfall, the Ukrainian aviators were still on their air base.

In the capital, Ukraine’s interim prime minister, Arseniy Yatsenyuk, urged the West to provide political and economic support as the Kiev stock market dropped a record 12 percent and the Ukrainian currency, the hryvnia, fell to new lows against the dollar and euro. The crisis also caused the Moscow market to fall 10 percent and the Russian ruble to dive.

Yatsenyuk stressed that Crimea remained part of Ukraine, but he conceded that there were “for today, no military options on the table.”

Obama administration officials said Russia now has 6,000 troops in Crimea. Ukraine’s ambassador to United Nations said yesterday that 16,000 additional Russian troops had been deployed to Crimea in past six days. Military experts estimate the size of the Ukrainian military in Crimea is about 30,000, but many of those are support staff.

Ukraine’s military, at an estimated size of 130,000 troops, is a considerably larger force than the small and poorly armed Georgian military that the Russians were able to intimidate in 2008, when those two countries went to war over break-away territory.

But while Ukrainian troops have held firm and refused to open their gates, but they are in an increasingly precarious position, “with no way out and no one to rescue them,” said a specialist on military affairs in Eurasia, who spoke on condition of anonymity because he is prohibited by his employer from talking to the media without permission.

“The Russian troops surrounding them are clearly well-trained special forces, well-disciplined enough that they managed to box up the Ukrainian forces without firing a shot,” the specialist said.

But some military experts said that, despite appearances, they doubted Russia was eager for a fight that might carry a steep price. Even in eastern Ukraine, where Russian is the predominant language, an incursion by Moscow could be a force to unify the divided country, said Dimitry Gorenburg, a senior research scientist at the Center for Naval Analyses in Alexandria, Va.

“They are certainly more pro-Russian and Russian speaking” in the east, he said, “but that doesn’t mean that they don’t have a Ukrainian national identity, especially when they are attacked. It is hard to imagine a course of action on the part of Russia that could have done more to unify Ukraine than what has been done.”

The Ukrainian military has no obvious fault lines, no ethnic or regional differences, that might make it vulnerable to defection and dissension.

At the same time, individual loyalties are unknown. If Yanukovych were to appoint himself head of a government in exile, he might be able to call in old favors from among officers. Like other institutions in Ukraine, the military has been beset by corruption, which could mean officers might be beholden to people other than their superiors.

Earlier in the Crimean port, a Ukrainian admiral who defected to the side of the rebellious, pro-Russian Crimean government tried to persuade his fellow officers in a meeting yesterday morning to join him. They refused.

As they did in Sunday’s standoff at a Ukrainian army base in Perevalne, armed Russian troops, demonstrating who was in charge, posted guards at the gates of the Ukraine naval station in Sevastopol as Ukrainian marines appeared to be trapped inside the base.

Related

Kerry’s Kiev trip puts him on diplomatic front line against Putin

Tuesday, March 4, 2014

Secretary of State John Kerry is due to arrive in Kiev today, as the U.S. and its European allies seek ways to increase economic and diplomatic pressure to deter Russian military escalation in Ukraine’s Crimea region. Kerry’s stop in the Ukrainian capital will raise the stakes by putting him on the diplomatic front lines in the increasingly tense standoff. Ukraine’s …

Legacy Comments10

No worries here, secretary Kerry is on the scene, besides president Obama warned us the greatest danger we face is global warming.

The US really has a problem telling a country it shouldn't invade another sovereign country considering the invasion of Iraq under a pretext. I see all these chicken hawks are ready for war again. So all you safe arm chair experts what would you do? Drop a nuclear bomb? Come on, you must have a plan. What would you do? I don't really expect any answers because all this crisis to you right wingers is a chance to bash Obama.

Kerry said "all options are on the table"....so I assume dropping a nuclear bomb is an option.

The US really has a problem telling a country it shouldn't invade another sovereign country considering the invasion of Iraq under a pretext. I see all these chicken hawks are ready for war again. So all you safe arm chair experts what would you do? Drop a nuclear bomb? Come on, you must have a plan. What would you do? I don't really expect any answers because all this crisis to you right wingers is a chance to bash Obama.

Obama and Biden have now both been proven 100% wrong in what they stated in their debates. Both Romney and Palin in their debates were 100% correct in their statements about Russia and the Ukraine - my... my.... how the lame stream press hides things from their LIDV's

And Obama is an impotent weakling who has no idea of how the world works. If progressives had their way they would say: "OK, ok, we will lay down out arms, not defend ourselves, come on in and take us over, we deserve this, just don't hit me, please, can't we all just get along (sob, sob)

Yeah, BPR, I was watching tough guy Kerry give a speech and he was going on and on about how there will be consequences for Russia. He said they are considering throwing Russia out of the G8 Summit. Kinda reminds you of Kerry stating that there would be consequences if Russia gave Snowden asylum. Well they did and there were no consequences. I am pretty sure Putin knows who he is dealing with and he knows that now is the time to do whatever he wants. And we thought Hillary was useless.

I wonder.... The US has major military installations in Ankara and Incirlik Turkey. If Turkey was in the same national upheaval as the Ukraine would the US send in more troops to protect the base and the American civilians. We see comments almost daily complaining the US did not bring more troops into areas of local conflict especially after someone dies. Is Russia really doing anything different here? So far Russia has not fired a shot, would the US do that?

HEADLINES: 3-4-14 Russia test-fires ICBM amid tension over Ukraine Headline: Russia fires its first shots in Crimea as soldiers warn off unarmed Ukrainian troops advancing on occupied airfield Daily Mail [UK] by John Hall 3-4-14

So like I asked - would the US do the same thing in Turkey? You have made many posts about the US not sending more troops into Benghazi (even though the ambassador refused them), so why should Russia not be allowed to do it to protect their bases and people........... Tillie in above post may have hit it the best - a chance to cheap shots at Obama.

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.