Hi 36° | Lo 18°

Ayotte a target vote for new gun, domestic violence legislation

U.S. Sen. Kelly Ayotte is the top target in a new push to strengthen federal laws that keep domestic abusers from purchasing guns.

Everytown for Gun Safety, a national advocacy group, has been airing an ad on WMUR this week to coincide with a U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on a new bill introduced by Sen. Amy Klobuchar, a Minnesota Democrat. The bill aims to tighten federal laws to ensure that those with a domestic violence conviction lose their rights to purchase guns. A hearing on the bill Wednesday featured personal stories about gun violence from across the country, including perspectives from two New Hampshire residents. It was also the first ever hearing before the U.S. Senate Judiciary Committee that linked guns and domestic violence.

The group’s ad features a harrowing scene of a woman calling 911 from inside a house as a man comes in and grabs a child. The camera cuts off as he fires a shot at the woman. The ad tells viewers to “stop gun violence against women” by providing a number to text. It does not give any information about domestic violence hot lines or specific legislation.

Ayotte, a Republican, will review the legislation, spokeswoman Liz Johnson said. Johnson also noted Ayotte’s previous efforts to provide protections for women against violence and said Ayotte fully supports a new New Hampshire law that makes domestic violence a specific crime, known as Joshua’s Law.

“Senator Ayotte has worked throughout her career to stop domestic violence and protect women from being victimized,” Johnson said in an email. “She co-sponsored legislation in the Senate to renew the landmark Violence Against Women act, and she helped lead the effort to secure its passage.”

Everytown is an umbrella organization for Mayors Against Illegal Guns and Moms Demand Action. New Hampshire’s chapter was active in pushing for a bill to expand background checks that did not pass in the state Legislature this session, and it has been active in efforts to get stores such as Target to stop allowing customers to openly carry firearms in their stores. Most recently, after a mass shooting in Santa Barbara, Calif., the group delivered 4,200 “Not one more” cards to Ayotte’s local office.

“We just keep seeing that every time there’s another mass shooting other people reach out to get involved,” said Janet Groat, president of the group’s New Hampshire’s chapter.

The ad is airing in Washington, D.C., New Hampshire, Arizona and Nevada. In Arizona and Nevada, the campaign is targeting those states’ respective Republican senators – Jeff Flake and Dean Heller. On Wednesday, former U.S. representative Gabby Giffords, who was shot in the head in a shooting in Arizona in 2011, called on Ayotte to support the bill. Ayotte was seen as a key swing vote in a push last year to strengthen the background check system after the shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School. That amendment would have required background checks for gun shows and internet sales, in addition to the check requirement for purchases from federally licensed gun dealers. Ayotte ultimately voted against it, and instead backed an amendment aimed at encouraging states to submit mental health records to the federal background checks system, according to an analysis by PolitiFact.

Klobuchar’s bill would make it illegal for anyone convicted of domestic violence or stalking to purchase a firearm.

New Hampshire passed a bill this year that strengthens the state’s domestic violence laws, and Everytown is pointing to that bill as a model of domestic violence legislation, even though it was not specifically about guns. The bill, called Joshua’s Law, was introduced in response to a murder-suicide in Manchester last year, where a man named Muni Savyon shot his son Joshua and then himself during a supervised visit at a YWCA.

Under previous New Hampshire law, domestic violence was not its own crime. Instead, someone who hit his or her spouse would be charged with simple assault. Joshua’s Law reorganized the existing criminal law to make domestic violence its own category. Advocates for the bill, including the New Hampshire Coalition Against Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault, said the bill would help the police and courts better identify pattern abusers and respond. Ninety-two percent of murder-suicides in New Hampshire are domestic violence related, according to the coalition.

This bill relates to guns because it streamlines the system to ensure firearms stay out of the hands of domestic abusers. Not characterizing crimes as domestic violence before led to some instances in which people convicted of nondomestic violence assaults were denied gun purchases. One thing Joshua’s Law doesn’t do is require stalking convictions to be entered into the federal background check system. If the Klobuchar bill passes, stalking convictions would prohibit people from purchasing guns.

Joshua’s Law unanimously passed the Republican-led state Senate and passed with all but three votes in the Democratic-led House. Gov. Maggie Hassan signed it June 19.

“Senator Ayotte fully supports existing New Hampshire law that allows a court to order a person who is the subject of a domestic violence order to relinquish firearms and ammunition. And she also fully supports the recently enacted-Joshua’s Law, making domestic violence a separate category of crime and incorporating stalking into the list of domestic violence crimes,” Johnson, Ayotte’s spokeswoman, said.

(Kathleen Ronayne can be reached at 369-3309 or or on Twitter @kronayne.)

Legacy Comments4

Instead of new "feel good laws" that only punish the law abiding people (and the victims of domestic violence), we should invest in gun safety and usage training in the schools and local police departments should take an active role in providing low cost and high quality training.

this is NOT a federal issue - It is a states rights issue. The federal govt has no business legislating this. For the LIDV's -10th Amendment "The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people"

Very true, this is why we have our representatives handling this for us. More over this is a human rights issue as opposed to state or federal - but since we as civilized people are not capable of making the right decisions all the time we need laws and regulations. Who cares who passes it, this way we get one law instead of needing 50 different ones for the same thing. Called streamlining the process.

A bad law is much worse than nothing. Attempting to limit guns to people only accused of a crime is wrong by any measurement. Instead we should make it easier for people to take responsibility for their own safety, The idea that police or government has a duty/responsibility to protect any individual is not only wrong (SCOTUS Castle Rock) but not reasonable due to the fact that violent crimes only lase seconds.

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.