Letter: Choose Rubens over Brown
I see these points made against Scott Brown as a U.S. Senate candidate from New Hampshire – and I think my e-mail delivered me something very sound.
“When nearly a quarter-million people were out of work in Massachusetts, Scott Brown is still the guy who voted against three jobs bills. When millions of people across the country are struggling with student loan debt, Scott Brown is still the guy who voted to let the interest rates on student loans double. When Republicans got together to push a bill that would let employers deny coverage for birth control, Scott Brown is still the guy who cosponsored it. When Wall Street nearly crashed the economy and no one went to jail, Scott Brown is still the guy who worked to weaken rules to hold big financial institutions accountable.”
Independents, concerned Republicans – on Sept. 9 vote, for candidate Jim Rubens over candidate Scott Brown.
Give New Hampshire voters a candidate to consider in November. Rubens offers a mixed bag of positions, and one that doesn’t get reported enough is that Rubens is pro-choice.
Women’s health is a matter between women and their doctors. Smith and Brown are not there in support of women.
Support Rubens and tell your friends to do the same. He’s also the candidate not financed by Wall Street money, thus not owing legislative favors.
LYNN RUDMIN CHONG