M/sunny
30°
M/sunny
Hi 36° | Lo 23°

New England Views: Gains outweigh costs for hydropower from Quebec

The rolling hills of northern New Hampshire are among the treasures of New England, and the prospect of an elevated power line cutting across the face of these ranges instinctively seems distressing. This sort of fear – of the destruction of natural beauty as well as the disruption to the local tourism industry due to this damage – has characterized the debate surrounding Northern Pass, a high-voltage transmission line being built by Northeast Utilities that will carry 1,200 megawatts of Canadian hydropower to the New England grid. The proposed route runs the length of New Hampshire, and much of the northernmost 40 miles will travel through forestland. It is understandable that the people of New Hampshire are concerned.

Yet there is more to this issue than just power lines crossing through northern forests.

In a June report issued by the New England ISO – the regional body that oversees the New England power grid – there are 28 decades-old coal and oil power plants currently online that are expected to be retired by 2020. Combined, these plants produce more than 8,000 megawatts of power that will need to be replaced. Some of these stations will probably be converted to natural gas facilities, but that would only further concerns about New England’s overreliance on a single fuel source. As of 2011, over half of all of the region’s current power comes from natural gas, which is relatively difficult to transport and nearly impossible to store at power plants. This situation also leaves New England dangerously susceptible to price changes. In an ideal world, solar and wind power would be able to fill this impending gap, but the technology to deliver such energy on the necessary scale isn’t yet economically feasible. The development of these clean energy technologies should be strongly encouraged, but it isn’t a good reason to reject Canadian hydropower.

The Conservation Law Foundation, one of the groups protesting the project, has raised concerns over the environmental impacts of hydropower, noting that forests are destroyed to create the reservoirs that power hydroelectric dams. In response, Northeast Utilities argues that all the power to be transmitted via the Northern Pass project is already being generated by existing dams. But this seems disingenuous when Hydro-Quebec, the utility company that would lease the Northern Pass line, is currently building a massive, four-dam complex on the Romaine River in Canada.

Even so, over the lifespan of the dam, hydropower adds much less CO2 to the environment than fossil fuels, and the Northern Pass project will help New England reduce its carbon footprint significantly – especially if it’s supplemented by other renewables.

There is also concern that, under pressure from Northeast Utilities, Massachusetts will follow Connecticut’s example and count large-scale hydroelectric power toward the state’s renewable-energy portfolio standard – one of the mechanisms by which Massachusetts encourages the use of green energy sources. Allowing this to happen would seriously undercut the growth of the Commonwealth’s burgeoning wind and solar sectors, and threaten Massachusetts’ long-term energy goals. But Canadian hydropower, if treated by lawmakers the same way as coal or natural gas, could reduce the state’s carbon footprint without crowding out solar and wind.

Northeast Utilities left a bad first impression with its heavy-handed efforts to sell its initial plan to New Hampshirites, and this has forced the company to play two years of expensive damage control, including drawing an entirely new route through northern New Hampshire that brings the cost of the project to $1.4 billion.

But no amount of bad public relations changes the fact that New England needs new energy sources soon, and Northern Pass’s offer of relatively green, relatively cheap Canadian hydropower is one of the best available options. It would be a mistake not to pursue it.

(This editorial first appeared in the Boston Globe on Sept. 22. It is reprinted with permission.)

Related

My Turn: Northern Pass: Burying line is far too pricey

Monday, November 4, 2013

Opponents of the Northern Pass transmission project, many of whom would allegedly support the project if all 187 miles were buried, often point to the 333-mile, “totally buried” Champlain Hudson Power Express project as an example of economic underground transmission burial. While the projects offer similarities in that they both deliver reliable, base load hydroelectricity from Canada, the terrain and …

My Turn: Northern Pass’s Lincoln open house: corporate marketing, lacking answers

Monday, November 4, 2013

On the evening of Sept. 11, residents of Easton were afforded the opportunity to attend a Northern Pass “open house” in Lincoln. The 40-mile round trip unfortunately confirmed what is now emerging in press reports: Northern Pass has staged yet another hollow and expensive public relations event. Questions about the project’s likely impacts were unanswered. Realistic options, such as burial …

My Turn: Is PSNH on the wrong side of history?

Monday, November 4, 2013

For about 100 years, the trend in the generation of electricity for public consumption was toward bigger and bigger power plants, culminating in shopping-mall-sized generators at nuclear plants and unimaginably huge hydropower developments. For most of that time, larger power plants led to more efficient operation and lower-cost electricity. Then several factors converged that changed everything. The Seabrook class of …

Legacy Comments3

If a reader does NOT know that NP is a critical National Security infrastructure project that is necessary....... then you are most certainly what is know as a "low information voter"

-and if a poster thinks people from NH are so stupid as to believe the fear mongering of those who stand to profit at our expense, why is it that you still don't have a complete route after all these years? You can call us names but you can't call us "gullible". Bury it all the way or forget it.

At the Concord NP meeting, Sept. 23rd, those who spoke FOR it were about 10 percent and either politicians or wore blue shirts and were looking for a job. Those who spoke AGAINST it were the 90 percent and wore orange.

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.