P/cloudy
65°
P/cloudy
Hi 82° | Lo 58°
Report to Readers

Report to Readers: Two pieces of old news

I had several calls from readers today wondering why it took us so long to get the story into the paper. As it turns out, they were talking about two different stories. Here’s what happened:

In the first case, our critic griped about the story in the Sunday Monitor concerning Stacie Laughton, who was elected to the Legislature this month from Nashua. Immediately following the election, Laughton, a Democrat, received attention for being the state’s first transgender state representative – Laughton was born a man but identifies as a woman. But the “new” news about Laughton was less revolutionary: She has a criminal past, which included serving four months in prison in 2008 on conspiracy to commit credit card fraud charges.

Surely voters would have liked to have known that information before Election Day, rather than after, my caller said. That knowledge might have changed some votes.

Hard to argue.

The Monitor has run two stories about Laughton in the past few weeks, both of them originally published by The Telegraph, the daily newspaper in Nashua. We have a story- and photo-sharing arrangement with the Telegraph and several other papers in the state, which allows us to broaden the scope of news we make available to readers here. The story about the crime in Laughton’s past is one that the Monitor staff would have been unlikely to pursue ourselves before the election even if we had heard about it at the time. She lives so far away that her name wouldn’t have appeared on any local ballots; our election focus was chiefly on local races. That said, had the Telegraph found out about Laughton’s past before Nov. 6, no doubt the story would have been written then – and made available for us to use too.

The second bit of old news: Concord Mayor Jim Bouley’s rental agreement with city developer Steve Duprey – an agreement in place since 2008. Reporter Laura McCrystal’s story from the weekend has generated considerable attention, including from readers who didn’t think it was newsworthy at all. But a few callers this morning made an opposite charge: Why didn’t the Monitor tell us about this four years ago?

An easy answer to that one, alas: We just learned about it last week.

If Laughton had been a Rep I wonder if the CM would have persued the story even if they knew about it before the election. A felon running for any office is usually top news if they are a Rep. Not so much if they are a Dem. Also, Laughton ran for office before. Hard to believe that her record has never been checked to actually see if she had criminal issues. The statement that Nashua is so far away gave me a chuckle. My guess is that many voters in Nashua would have liked to have that information before the election. But then again, with the protection of the left leaning media who focus on the right at all costs, I guess they miss a few felons now an again, especially if they are Dems.

"She lives so far away that her name wouldn’t have appeared on any local ballots; our election focus was chiefly on local races."....lol...Nashua is only a couple miles difference from Concord than Mont Vernon...and Laconia is 4 miles closer....just sayin'...We will be waiting for the editorial demanding her to resign....

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.