P/sunny
87°
P/sunny
Hi 87° | Lo 62°

My Turn

Bill will destroy auto dealers

Legislation targets big N.H. industry

New Hampshire has always been governed by the “Live Free or Die” mentality: protect the state’s competitive business climate while keeping the needs and interests of consumers of paramount importance. A Nanny State initiative now moving through the Legislature, however, undermines such notions and would hurt the state’s economy and consumer confidence. While it might not be a household name now, if Senate Bill 126 passes it could soon affect you.

The legislation seeks to assert greater government involvement in the relationship between automobile manufacturers and New Hampshire auto dealers. It will broaden regulations so that lawn tractors and farm, construction and forestry equipment are treated as automobiles.

Until now, the relationship between automobile manufacturers and New Hampshire dealers has been governed by fair, balanced and strict franchise agreements that protect each selling partner and help keep prices low for consumers.

While proponents claim SB 126 is designed to help New Hampshire auto dealers, the reality is that the legislation simply allows dealers to ignore the contracts they’ve signed with automakers, which includes things like periodical show room renovations.

Those contracts, however, play a valuable role in the marketplace, as they ensure both parties can be counted on to fulfill corporate commitments. In saying auto dealers no longer are required to hold up their end of the bargain, the government would vastly expand its power, allowing politics to override free-market principles and tilt policies in favor of one segment of an industry over the other.

Such policy-making will lead to increased government involvement in the business process, the prioritization of litigation, and ultimately higher prices for products sold by the auto industry, all of which will contribute to rising prices for automobiles that consumers will be forced to absorb.

Moreover, by enabling one party to ignore contractual obligations, the state government would set the stage for more legal disputes.

This too increases the government’s involvement in the day-to-day business process, as the courts are now allowed to decide whether or not business contracts need to be honored.

There is no doubt this will also strain the relationship between dealers and manufacturers.

The increased cost hurdles threatened by this strained relationship may encourage many manufacturers and dealers to withdraw from using certain popular incentive programs to avoid the added economic costs of inevitable litigation, driving up the cost of purchase for the consumer.

Of course, by diminishing such incentive programs and driving up prices for vehicles and repairs at New Hampshire dealerships, it won’t be long before New Hampshirites will head to bordering states to buy their cars and avoid the added costs for repairs and production.

Why would you pay a premium in New Hampshire when a short drive to a Massachusetts, Vermont or Maine dealership will offer you a better deal?

The legislation also directly targets an industry that employs more than 14,000 New Hampshire residents. With the automobile industry already struggling in the state, we cannot afford to have even more uncertainty added to the sector’s economic outlook and bottom line.

When passing legislation that reforms existing business practices, especially business practices that already work well and are well ingrained in commercial culture, it is important lawmakers make sure it will benefit all individuals involved in the process ­ the most important of which is consumers.

The fact of the matter is that SB 126 is not a “shop local” bill: It encourages a nanny-state mentality, increases costs and damages the state’s economic competitiveness.

What New Hampshire needs is legislation that recognizes manufacturers and dealers as partners and creates pro-business advantages that are based on free-market principles.

We must continue New Hampshire’s Live Free or Die tradition, rather than allowing the state to pick winners and losers among manufacturers and dealerships.

(Stephen DeMaura is president of Americans for Job Security and former executive director of the New Hampshire Republican State Committee.)

OK, now I am really confused. I found this in the Laconia Daily Sun - "Donna Gaudet Hosmer of Laconia, a principal of the AutoServ dealerships of Tilton and Laconia who chairs the New Hampshire Automobile Dealers Association (NHADA), said yesterday that by strengthening current law, Senate Bill 126, the "Dealer Bill of Rights," will help to ensure a balanced relationship between local dealerships and national manufacturers." You claim exactly the opposite is true. Furthermore you make the claim that this is an attack on NH Industry. While the NHADA claims that this will benefit their member dealers. Who to believe? It doesn't help that Americans for Job Security has less than a stellar reputation when it comes to integrity. It is also odd that such a right leaning organization would have issue with a piece of GOP sponsored legislation.

Post a Comment

You must be registered to comment on stories. Click here to register.