Response to GWTW: This line began as an attempt to clarify both the definition of 'moderate' and to identify examples of moderates in the Republican Party. I think we finally established there is at least one: Susan Collins. Which fact provides no support for your claim that the Democratic Party has moved farther left than the Republicans have move rightward. That claim does not hold up to the facts, as political scientists Tom Ornstein and Robert Mann pointed out in the WaPo last year. They could be describing the CM's Carp Per Diem gang, just as well as the John Boenhers and Paul Ryans of the GOP: "We have no choice but to acknowledge that the core of the problem lies with the Republican Party." In their words, it's become "ideologically extreme, scornful of compromise, unmoved by conventional understanding of facts, evidence, and science, and dismissive of the legitimacy of its political opposition." For as long as I've been on this site, there has been a steady rain from conservatives of opinion masquerading as fact on here--including muddying the definition of 'moderate', that aptly fits this description. They went on to say that while Democrats "may have moved from their 40 yd. line to their 25, Republicans have moved from their 40 to somewhere behind the goal post." Rabbit claimed to be a moderate, but doesn't know what the word means, then took her ball and went home. You, on the other hand, know that Collins is a moderate, but can't resist the cheap partisan sniping from your far-right vantage point at any opportunity: Bully for you. But that's also troll-like behavior, shedding more heat than light. Bottom line--the Republican Party has lost nearly all of its moderate voices. And you seem to be o.k. with that. But we'll never know, since you're content to sit back smugly and blame the nation's ills on one party and one president. Does that make you part of the solution, or part of the problem? Does it even matter to you? it's impossible to tell. ...(full comment)