|
By Robert Frypp - 07/13/2011 - 3:47 pm
...meanwhile, you spin it, spin it and spin it some more until it meets your hiccup minded agenda. It's the only tool you have. Bottom line, regardless of it's source, it's a simple minded slogan for simple minded folks to spew forth when they have nothing else to offer. And if me being a liberal is what gets you all excited, then so be it. I'll be your liberal. Yipeeee, you get to use your favorite worn out word some more!! |
|
By Robert Frypp - 07/13/2011 - 3:45 pm
...meanwhile, you spin it, spin it and spin it some more until it meets your hiccup minded agenda. It's the only tool you have. Bottom line, regardless of it's source, it's a simple minded slogan for simple minded folks to spew forth when they have nothing else to offer. And if me being a liberal is what gets you all excited, then so be it. I'll be your liberal. Yipeeee, you get to use your favorite worn out word some more!! |
|
By Robert Frypp - 07/12/2011 - 2:24 pm
...end of story. Head south Mitt, head south, see if you find a break through down there. Apart from that, I also find it hilarious that someone would repeatedly use the insipid words of Sarah Palin as their "end of conversation" line, as if that is some logic stuffed case breaker for all involved. Lol, the levels of cluelessness, just hilarious. |
|
By Robert Frypp - 07/08/2011 - 8:01 am
...he looks like an overly coiffed, insincerely concerned mannequin in every one of them. |
|
By Robert Frypp - 07/04/2011 - 11:12 pm
...but go ahead and decipher it in the way that best satisfies your need to apply an obsessive label to everything, regardless of factuality. And also, thank you for proving my point. |
|
By Robert Frypp - 07/04/2011 - 7:08 pm
...or too, when you post your blanketing, no dimensional, label littered diatribes. You just spew the word forth in full knee-jerk fashion, at the start, end and middle of just about every point you attempt to make. Even in reference to topics where the term would not even need to enter the conversation to get the point across. But in the end, it only comes off as a deep seeded obsession with labels and anything constructive you might have to add comes after that, at best. That is, if someone can actually bear to wade through your rant that far. But, as you might say; "there are support groups for that". |
Great point. You're right, Most of the roads in this area aren't wide enough to accommodate two vehicles and a bike. Which is why it is the motorist's responsibility to pass cyclists in a safe manner at a safe distance when they overtake a cyclist. If a motorist is approaching a bicyclist (who is also following the rules of the road) and a vehicle is coming in the opposing lane, they simply slow down and wait a couple seconds until there IS enough distance to pass the cyclist, at a safe distance apsrt from them. It's a simple choice, for both cyclists and motorists, to follow the rules of the road. And we all know there are blatant rule breakers on both sides of the coin, but that is for another discussion.
to vote