Why is the mainstream press so critical of election deniers, and those who, once nominated, announce that if they do not win, there has been fraud? Instead of criticism, why does the press not realize that once nominated, self-appointed victors, regardless of whether there was fraud or any election shenanigans, have a great plan, do they not?
The voters and the general public need not spend time, effort, gas money, and can ignore the process of actually voting, can they not? They were nominated, were they not? The election process must be rigged if they are not elected. Is that not the new standard? Who needs polls, poll workers, hanging chads, voter registration, campaigns, listening to the candidates, going to forums, voting machines? In short, who needs participatory democracy when these self-appointed nominees announce they have been elected?
Robert Stein
Concord