President Barack Obama has a laugh with Sen. Jeanne Shaheen and New Hampshire Democratic Senate candidate, Gov. Maggie Hassan, upon his arrival at Pease Air National Guard Base in Newington on Monday, Nov. 7, 2016, for a campaign rally for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton.
President Barack Obama has a laugh with Sen. Jeanne Shaheen and New Hampshire Democratic Senate candidate, Gov. Maggie Hassan, upon his arrival at Pease Air National Guard Base in Newington on Monday, Nov. 7, 2016, for a campaign rally for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton. Credit: AP

We no longer have any doubt that Sens. Jeanne Shaheen and Maggie Hassan are disinterested in representing the people of New Hampshire in the U.S. Senate and are now exclusively committed to placating their party bosses and obstructing President Donald Trumpโ€™s positive agenda.

This became very clear when Shaheen and Hassan voted against Mike Pompeoโ€™s nomination to be the next secretary of state despite both having voted to approve him as CIA director just last year. Way back then (2017), Shaheen said she was โ€œimpressed with his strong condemnation of Russian aggressionโ€ and felt he was qualified to steer the CIAโ€™s mission โ€œto protect our nation against foreign adversaries.โ€

What changed? This time they folded to pressure from Democratic Party bigwigs and leftist outside groups, whose interests they placed above our nationโ€™s security. Notably, state and national media outlets mocked Shaheen and Hassan for their half-baked rationales.

ShaHassan pulled the same stunt earlier this year when the partisan pair voted to shut down the government rather than compromise on the issue of illegal immigration. Prior to that they both voted in lockstep with their party against the successful Republican tax reform measure, which today fuels our economy, creates new jobs, and puts more money into peopleโ€™s paychecks. They both voted against the nomination of highly qualified jurist Neil Gorsuch, now a justice on the U.S. Supreme Court.

RNC Chairwoman Ronna McDaniel was right when she said congressional Democrats โ€œhate this president more than they love this country.โ€

You donโ€™t have to take my word for it. The Lugar Center-McCourt School released its Bipartisan Index recently. NH Journalโ€™s Michael Graham observed that, โ€œwhile Sen. (Kelly) Ayotte was the 12th most bipartisan U.S. Senator in the previous Congress, Sen. Hassan currently ranks 71st in reaching across the partisan aisle among the Senateโ€™s 100 members.โ€ Hassan either lied during the campaign or broke her promise once in office when she pledged to be an independent voice in the Senate.

Essentially, New Hampshireโ€™s federal delegation has become objectively more partisan in just the last year and a half. This is unfortunate because New Hampshire is a bipartisan place. Itโ€™s unfortunate also because it results in bad government and poor representation in Washington for the people of the Granite State. New Hampshire deserves something more valuable than puppets on a string for Sen. Chuck Schumer.

While the Democrats deliver nothing but partisan obstruction, Republicans are delivering prosperity.

Good things are starting to happen for regular, working Americans as New Hampshireโ€™s partisan delegation sits on the sidelines, arms crossed and pouting. The nationโ€™s 4.1 percent unemployment rate is the lowest weโ€™ve seen since 2000. U.S. weekly jobless claims are the lowest theyโ€™ve been since bellbottoms and butterfly collars were in fashion. In March, the U.S. trade deficit shrank for the first time in seven months. New Hampshire has the lowest unemployment in New England.

Itโ€™s all too much for ShaHassan to take, apparently.

Granite Staters and all Americans have a choice. We can follow ShaHassan down the road of obstruction and hyper-partisanship. Or we can continue to pursue responsible Republican policies that deliver prosperity.

(Jeanie Forrester is the chairwoman of the New Hampshire Republican State Committee.)