A Casella recycling truck drives into Thetford Academy in Thetford, Vt., on March 25, to pick up zero-sort recycling. (Valley News - Jennifer Hauck) Copyright Valley News. May not be reprinted or used online without permission. Send requests to permission@vnews.com.
A Casella recycling truck drives into Thetford Academy in Thetford, Vt., on March 25, to pick up zero-sort recycling. (Valley News - Jennifer Hauck) Credit: Jennifer Hauck

A veto override is the last chance for a bill that would establish new setbacks between landfills and water bodies after Gov. Chris Sununu vetoed the measure last week.

Proponents of the bill believe it has enough bipartisan support to advance without the governorโ€™s signature. The bill passed 16-8 in the Senate and on a voice vote in the House, and it will require a two-thirds majority in both chambers to overcome the governorโ€™s veto and become law.

โ€œOur team is really focused on the override at this point, and weโ€™re feeling confident that weโ€™ll prevail there,โ€ said Tom Tower, a board member of the North Country Alliance for Balanced Change and a supporter ofย House Bill 1454.

If the bill doesnโ€™t pass this year, advocates say theyโ€™ll return next session to try again to pass stricter regulations.

Currently, state law requires landfills to be at least 200 feet from the nearest body of water. But when Casella Waste Management proposed building a new landfill in Dalton on land abutting Forest Lake State Park, some residents raised concerns that pollutants from the landfill could contaminate the lake. The company has since withdrawn its permit applications, although it plans to resubmit them in the future, Vice President Joe Fuscoย told NHPRย this month.

HB 1454 would require landfills to be far enough from a body of water that it would take five years for groundwater to reach the body of water. This would allow enough time to detect contaminants and intervene before state waterways become polluted, according to proponents of the measure, who say this is a statewide issue.

In aย veto message, Sununu said he opposed the bill because it would likely hamper the development of landfills in the state, which he said could lead to higher costs for transporting trash out of state.

โ€œNew Hampshireโ€™s landfill regulations are already rigorous and robust,โ€ he said in the statement.

Proponents of the measure took Sununu to task.ย 

Adam Finkel, a resident of Dalton who worked on the language of the bill, said of the 44 pages of landfill regulations only two address siting a landfill. And that language, Finkel said, is archaic and unprotective.

Tower said proponents of HB 1454 estimate it would prevent landfills on only about 15 percent of the stateโ€™s landmass. Those estimates are based on numbers from the Department of Environmental Services.