Harry Kinter is ill-informed
On Aug. 24, 2024, Harry Kinter voiced his opinion on Jose Cambrils attempted 40-acre land grab off Whitney Hill Road in Canterbury in 2023. In Kinter’s opinion, Cambrils has done “all the right things.” I wonder if Kinter has the same ethical and moral compass as Cambrils, because if you follow Kinter’s logic, he feels that filing a fraudulent deed and illegally posting a property that does not belong to you is ok and “procedurally correct.” I think most rational people might disagree with this.
Kinter, question: if that was “procedurally correct” as you claim, why has Cambrils parted company with his lawyer, citing disagreements over the (fraudulent) deed Cambrils filed in 2023, with Cambrils being both the grantor and grantee? Maybe it is because Cambrils lawyer knew the difference between right and wrong and is not morally or ethically bankrupt as his former client is?
The only thing Kinter and I can agree on is the Town of Canterbury has gone above and beyond to try and find the rightful owner of the property. It is not the guy that is desperately trying once again to be re-elected and be the voice of Loudon and Canterbury, not that he has amounted to much of anything at all as a state representative if you research his record.
Josestealsland.net? Maybe the signs should have read Joseillegallypostsandtriestostealand.net.