Educators have long recognized the value of assessment in instruction. A mantra we used in the private and public schools where I taught was, “Teach a little, test a little.”
Teachers look for areas of confusion or weakness in their students so they can correct them and clarify what has been misunderstood, as well as provide additional practice time. This is true in any kind of instruction, not only language arts and math, but also for learning to ride a bike, make an omelet, or play a musical instrument. Viewing assessment as an unnecessary burden deprives the teacher and student of a critical step in the learning process.
House Bill 20 seeks to validate any type of instruction, in any type of learning environment, without requiring assessment. Since assessment is not required, neither is accountability. While this may seem respectful to some, it is shortsighted and places an unnecessary burden on the school community. Quality learning may give way to mediocrity, and quite possibly, an inaccurate picture of success.
Our taxes should be used to promote quality education. Public schools are accustomed to standardized tests and expect to be held accountable for their performance. If New Hampshire property taxes are going to be used for private and religious schools, as well as tutors and homeschools, shouldn’t they be held to the same high standard as our public schools?
JUDITH PELLETTIERI
Warner