Letter: Fun with numbers

Published: 02-21-2025 9:27 AM

In his recent My Turn, “The myth of runaway federal spending,” Mark Fernald notes in defense of federal spending levels that Uncle Sam’s outlays as a percentage of GDP changed little between 1981 and 2023. What he doesn’t mention is that GDP, which includes government spending, doesn’t pay taxes, people do. A deeper dive reveals that the real (adjusted for inflation) growth in federal spending per person in his date range is 42% per person, which ain’t hay.

He goes on to say that federal revenue as a percentage of GDP has declined about 3.5% in the same period, which he attributes to underpayment of taxes by “the rich.” He doesn’t note that the top 5% of earners paid about 16% of the total tax take in 1981. In 2023, it was 66%. Fernald’s purpose in his essay was to castigate the Republicans, and I can think of plenty of reasons why that might be justified, but Democrats have been along for the jolly spending ride all the way and, for my part, I don’t think my neighbors or I are getting 42% better government than we were in 1981. I also very much doubt that “the rich,” no matter how heavily taxed, are going to be able to change that. I carry no brief for the R’s or the D’s (or “the rich” for that matter), but I can add and I don’t like the sums I’m seeing going out the door.

Christopher Carley

Concord

Yesterday's Most Read Articles

Webster seized and sold his house for back taxes. Now the town has agreed to pay him $38,000
A Webster property was sold for unpaid taxes in 2021. Now, the former owner wants his money back
‘The rug pulled out from under me’: For certain police and firefighters, last-minute changes to retirement deal breeds distrust
NH Supreme Court dismisses case of Concord lacrosse player over eligibility to play
Universal EFA program sees 2,000 applications in first week of expansion
Hillclimbs, nightlife and cruising: Enthusiasts flock to 102nd Laconia Motorcycle Week