Opinion: High-stakes game is a bad bet for Concord

By JUDITH KURTZ and MEREDITH COOLEY

Published: 02-13-2023 6:00 AM

Judith Kurtz and Meredith Cooley of Concord are members of Concord Greenspace (CG3).

Former State Senator Andy Sanborn (owner of The Draft Sports Bar & Grill & Casino) has plans to build a new 43,000-square-foot casino complex (almost the size of a football field) on the east side of our city.

Many Concord residents showed up at the Planning Board meeting on January 18th to express deep concerns regarding the casino development. Like them, we oppose the casino complex on multiple fronts. We urge the Planning Board to slow down and ask questions to assess how a development of this size and nature will impact the surrounding community, public safety, and Concord’s public resources.

There is significant evidence that Concord will likely see an increase in alcohol-related fatal traffic accidents with this casino plan, and we are concerned about the additional police resources that the proposed casino may require. We requested the police records for all “calls to service” in and around both the Draft (Sanborn’s existing establishment with a casino) and Buffalo Wild Wings (a comparable establishment with no casino).

From 2018 to 2022, there were 131 total calls to service from the Draft with 61 of a criminal/assault nature versus 114 overall calls from Buffalo Wild Wings with 37 of those calls being of a criminal/assault nature. That’s almost twice as many serious incident calls to The Draft, which is a far smaller establishment.

Additionally, these records end before the latest two police-involved incidents at The Draft — a patron flashing a gun on Oct. 27, 2022, and a fight with a fugitive arrest on January 22. Time should be taken to further review police reports, including those from similar casinos in neighboring towns (Belmont and Manchester).

From an equitable development perspective, we oppose this project because we believe it will have a net negative impact on the Heights, an already underserved area of the city. Sanborn touts job creation, but the jobs created by this project will be mostly minimum wage and lower-skilled jobs. These kinds of jobs do not help raise people out of poverty, nor do they provide transferable skills for when the casino slows down, as research shows it will over time.

In addition, Concord has a tight labor market that has resulted in already well-established, local businesses struggling to keep their doors open for full business hours due to a lack of staff.

Article continues after...

Yesterday's Most Read Articles

“It’s beautiful” – Eight people experiencing homelessness to move into Pleasant Street apartments
No deal. Laconia buyer misses deadline, state is out $21.5 million.
N.H. Educators voice overwhelming concerns over State Board of Education’s proposals on minimum standards for public schools
Matt Fisk will serve as next principal of Bow High School
High schools: Coe-Brown softball wins 5th straight, Concord’s McDonald pitches first varsity win, Tide’s Doherty scores 100th career point
Construction of housing project in former Church to begin with parking dispute in the rearview

Furthermore, the expansion of highly taxed gambling activities also raises equity issues, since the revenues come largely from low and moderate income households. Not to mention that a casino may scare away more desirable development and will likely decrease residential property values in nearby neighborhoods at a time when the city is working tirelessly to push through the new form-based zoning code that will help revitalize the Heights and other areas of Concord.

From a sustainable development perspective, the casino project will use undeveloped land instead of infilling existing commercial areas and utilizing established city infrastructure. So far, there has not been a review of the impact on traffic, sidewalk sufficiency, and the area wetlands. Why create new asphalt and disturb raw land and the urban canopy when other commercial buildings sit empty throughout the city?

While the Board reviews police calls, we also ask them to request a market analysis. Concord is considered to be a “saturated market” by those in the commercial gaming field. Where exactly is the population Sanborn is expecting to patronize this huge casino complex? The risks posed by a new casino in a saturated market include diminishing casino-related property tax revenue for Concord, a failed business that becomes a burden to the city, and another abandoned building where there was once open space.

What can be done? Many of us heard at the meeting last month that the casino project as currently proposed meets current zoning requirements, which is why the Planning Board’s hands appear to be tied. As of the publishing of this My Turn, this project will not be going before Concord City Council.

If the Planning Board can’t block the construction of a monster casino complex that will burden our police force and forever negatively define the character of our city, we ask the City Council to consider this application. This situation calls for a deeper discussion around our zoning, master plan, and the process through which our community can protect and promote the character of our city.

In the meantime, let’s never doubt the power of our voices in moving mountains. Together, we can stop predatory development that is betting on the Concord community’s ambivalence towards development on our east side.

Be heard at the Planning Board Public Hearing on Feb. 15  at 7 p.m. at City Chambers. You can also write the Planning Board and City Council.

]]>