Granite Geek: For wildfire as with everything else climate related, ‘unprecedented’ is the new normal

  • Portion of wildfire risk map from The dark area in Bow at the center bottom shows relatively high risk around the town forest just west of I-93. State Foresters Alliance

  • This photo from Tuesday night, Oct. 3, shows the fire burning on Dilly Cliffs near Woodstock. Courtesy

  • An Army Blackhawk helicopter drops a 600-pound load of water on the fire at the Lost River Gorge near Woodstock, New Hampshire on Friday, October 6, 2017. GEOFF FORESTER

  • An Army Blackhawk helicopter picks up a 600-pound load of water to drop it on the Lost River Gorge fire near Woodstock, New Hampshire on Friday, October 6, 2017. GEOFF FORESTER

  • Bemis Fire map May 16 2022 WMNF—Courtesy

Granite Geek
Published: 5/16/2022 6:17:02 PM

Of all the shocking weather emergencies we’ve seen in recent years, the one that really made the hair stand up on the back of my neck was last July’s wildfire that destroyed an entire town in British Columbia.

That out-of-nowhere disaster hits home in New England because British Columbia feels like the west coast’s equivalent of Maine. It’s got a few cities and some beautiful mountains, but mostly it’s lush forests thriving in a cool, wet climate with lots of rain and snow.

Seeing British Columbia weather soar to 121 degrees and fuel a rampaging fire that destroyed an entire town the size of Center Harbor was shocking because it means our weather could do that, too.

Suddenly I find it more worrisome to hear about New Hampshire’s relatively small and rare wildfires, like the pair that have shut down North Country hiking trails this month or the 2017 Dilly Cliff fire that might have been (but wasn’t) caused by a meteorite. It feels like they are becoming less small and less rare as harbingers of much worse things to come.

May being Wildfire Awareness Month, I decided to test this hypothesis on Patrick Hackley, director of the N.H. Division of Forests & Lands.

His first response: No, British Columbia is not Maine.

“We’ve got a different weather pattern, different forest – much more hardwood – and they have a decent amount of drought,” he said.

But Hackley agreed that changing weather patterns caused by accelerating climate change is raising the possibility of wildfire in New England. It’s also making it harder to predict New England’s future wildfire danger, and therefore how best to manage our woodlands.

“There’s plenty of debate and discussion and thought that’s going into what climate-friendly forestry actually is,” he said.

Hackley pointed to the state’s Forest Action Plan from 2020, which includes this statement:

“Another topic that played only a minor role in the last plan, but was much more prevalent during this planning process, was the role of climate change and its influence on the future of our forests and general ecosystem health. While the science of climate change is still developing, it is unclear what type of scenarios we will be facing in the future based on different carbon output models. What is known is that it will be an additional stressor on our forests.”

Should we be doing more prescribed fires to get rid of fuel on the ground? Less timber harvesting? More harvesting but in different patterns and timing?

Maybe we need active planting programs of the sort done for the timber industry a century ago but with ecosystems in mind? Or a push to establish southern trees here in anticipation of increasingly mid-Atlantic-ish weather? Or maybe we should keep our hands entirely off forests in hopes it will maximize carbon uptake?

These are all good questions with no obvious answers, partly because it’s not clear where weather is going. Historical trends that have always guided us are increasingly irrelevant as once-in-a-lifetime weather events occur over and over, and it’ll-never-happen-here disasters become possible.

As one person put it online, “Unprecedented is the new precedented.”

The unending disastrous fires out West are forcing everybody to take the issue more seriously. A company called First Street Foundation, long known for mapping flood risk, has just released its first wildfire risk map for the country including data that will be factored into some home sales and insurance premiums.

Encouragingly, virtually all of New England is at the lowest level of risk compared to the rest of the country – but as British Columbia found out, that isn’t the same as no risk.

The Northeast-Midwest State Foresters Alliance has a wildfire “risk explorer” for 20 states from Missouri to Maine at that includes an interactive map estimating risk down to city-block size parcels. It can’t tell me if I need to cut down trees near my house to protect myself but it’s the next step toward dealing with the realities of our ever-more-climate-altered world.

(David Brooks can be reached at (603) 369-3313 or or on Twitter @GraniteGeek.)

David Brooks bio photo

David Brooks is a reporter and the writer of the sci/tech column Granite Geek and blog, as well as moderator of Science Cafe Concord events. After obtaining a bachelor’s degree in mathematics he became a newspaperman, working in Virginia and Tennessee before spending 28 years at the Nashua Telegraph . He joined the Monitor in 2015.

Stay informed with our free email updates
Concord Monitor Daily Headlines
Concord Monitor Breaking News
Concord Monitor Dining & Entertainment
Concord Monitor Report For America Education
Concord Monitor Report For America Health
Concord Monitor Real Estate
Concord Monitor Sports
Concord Monitor Suncook Valley
Concord Monitor Contests & Promotions
Concord Monitor Weekly Most Popular
Concord Monitor Granite Geek
Concord Monitor Monitor Marquee
Concord Monitor Hopkinton
Concord Monitor Politics
Concord Monitor MY CONCORD
Concord Monitor Franklin

Concord Monitor Office

1 Monitor Drive
Concord,NH 03301


© 2021 Concord Monitor
Terms & Conditions - Privacy Policy

Customer Service

Social Media


View All Sections

Part of the Newspapers of New England Family