Letter: New Hampshire should fund students, not systems
Published: 02-07-2025 6:00 AM |
Opponents of EFAs, like letter-writer Kathleen Malsbenden, who wrote ‘Strengthen public education, not EFAs,’ focus on protecting institutions. True fairness means prioritizing students, not bureaucracies. Our current system forces children into schools based on zip codes, not their unique needs. HB 115 ensures every family, regardless of income, can access the best education possible — whether public, private or home-based. As a theology teacher at Bishop Brady High School in Concord, I believe the real injustice isn’t school choice; it’s denying parents the right to choose what’s best for their children.
Instead of propping up a system that fails many, New Hampshire should fund students, not systems. Critics claim EFAs drain resources from public schools, but the reality is that they expand opportunities while being both cost-effective and fiscally responsible. Here’s what the facts show: EFAs let parents choose the best education for their child. HB 115 expands access for all, not just those with financial need. EFAs cost $5,000 per student, far less than $20,000 in public schools, saving taxpayer dollars. In 26 of 29 studies, school choice led to better outcomes for public school students. EFAs cover tutoring, online courses and special programs, not just private tuition.
HB 115 ensures universal access, and New Hampshire can afford it: The Education Trust Fund has a budget surplus. At its core, school choice is about ensuring every child, not just those in well-funded districts, has access to the best education possible.
Ryan Bilodeau
Kennebunk, ME
Article continues after...
Yesterday's Most Read Articles





